IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.J. Kathawalla, Milind N. Jadhav, JJ.
Shri. Jeevan Mallapa Tonemare and Others – Appellants
Versus
Chief Officer, Kankavali Nagar Panchayat and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 13906 of 2016
Decided On : 23-03-2022
Reservation Lapsing - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act - Section 127, Section 126, Section 19, Section 24 - The purchase notice issued by the Petitioners is defective and not maintainable as it does not describe the said lands under reservation correctly in consonance with the provisions of Section 127(2) of the said Act. The Writ Petition is dismissed.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioners sought a declaration that their lands be declared free from reservation under the provisions of Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The said lands were reserved for the public amenity of 'Playground' by Resolution No.530 dated 01.11.1996. The State Government granted its sanction to the draft development plan of Kankavali under Section 31 of the said Act and by virtue thereof the said lands were reserved for the public purpose. The Petitioners issued a Purchase notice under the provisions of Section 127 of the said Act, but the notice was defective and not maintainable as it did not describe the said lands under reservation correctly.
Finding of the Court:
The purchase notice issued by the Petitioners is defective and not maintainable as it does not describe the said lands under reservation correctly in consonance with the provisions of Section 127(2) of the said Act. The Writ Petition is dismissed.
Issues: The main issue was the validity of the purchase notice issued by the Petitioners under the provisions of Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the purchase notice issued by the Petitioners was defective and not maintainable as it did not describe the said lands under reservation correctly in consonance with the provisions of Section 127(2) of the said Act.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
S.J. Kathawalla, Milind N. Jadhav, JJ.
By the present petition, the Petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs :
(bb) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to lapse the reservation to the extent of the Petitioners' land in R.S. No.220, Hissa No.8A and Hissa No. 9, CTS No.1016, total area 69 ares, situated at Kanakavali, Taluka Kanakavali, District Sindhudurg.
(bbb) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, and to quash and set aside an Award dated 18.04.2016 issued by Sub-Divisional Officer, Kanakavali Sub-Division, Kanakavali, under Section 23 of the Act of 2013 to the extent of the Petitioners' land in R.S. No.220, Hissa Nos.8A and 9, and C.S. No.1016, total area 69 ares, situated at Kanakavali, Taluka Kanakavali, District Sindhudurg.”
2. The Petitioners are the owners of land bearing Revisional Survey No.220A/Hissa No.8A and Revisional Survey No.220A/Hissa No.9 bearing CTS Nos.1016 and 1023, totally ad-measuring 69 Ares situated in Tahasil - Kankavali, District - Sindhudurg (hereinafter referred to as “the said lands”). The Petitioners have prayed for a declaration that the said lands be declared free from reservation under the provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (“the said Act”).
3. It would be necessary to refer to the relevant facts briefly before adjudicating the lis in the present Writ Petition.
3.2. On 15.12.1999, the State Government granted its sanction to the draft development plan of Kankavali under Section 31 of the said Act and by virtue thereof the said lands were reserved for the public purpose as;
| S.N. | Site No. | Desig. | S.N./CTS No. | Approximate Area in Hect - are | Implementary agency | Modification suggested as per section 28 | Remarks |
| 27 | 27 | Playgro und | CTS No. 1016 1017 1018 | 0.62.28 | Z.P. | Area Admeasurin g 0.1672 Hect. has been deleted and adjacent area 0.0216 Hectare has been included. | Revised area 0.4777 Hectors |
| 28 | 27 | Garden | S.No.2 20/8(pt) | 0.11.52 | Z.P. | - | - |
3.4. On 12.11.2010, the Forest Department intimated that the said lands were not covered under the provisions of Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927.
3.5. On 04.02.2011, the Respondent No.1 - Chief Officer - submitted the proposal to the Respondent No.3 - Collector for acquisition of the said lands.
3.6. On 22.02.2011, the Director of Excavation issued NOC for acquisition in respect of the said lands.
3.7. On 15.03.2011, the Respondent No.3 - Collector appointed the Respondent No.4 - Sub-Divisional Officer, Kankavali, Sub-Division (SDO) as Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) to take further steps for acquisition of the said lands.
3.8. On 27.09.2011, the SDO directed the Deputy Superintendent of Land Records (DSLR) to carry out joint measurement of the said lands.
3.9. On 12.04.2012, the Respondent No.1- Chief Officer deposited a sum of Rs.43,17,000/- with the SDO.
3.10. On 28.09.2012 the DSLR issued advanced notices to the Petitioners and other co-owners for fixing date for joint measurement of the said la
The purchase notice issued under the provisions of Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act must correctly describe the lands under reservation, failing which it is considered de....
The court established that under Sec. 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within a specified period after notice, the reservation lapses, allowing the landowner....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that if the appropriate authority makes the requisite application to acquire the land within one year from the confirmation of the Purchase Not....
Reservation lapses under Section 127 MRTP Act if no acquisition steps within 24 months of purchase notice, even if notice lacks title documents or detailed description, as authority's inaction deems ....
Reservation of land lapses under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act when no acquisition steps are taken within the specified period after a purchase notice is served.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, if no steps for the acquisition of land reserved for public purposes ar....
Land in question had lapsed by operation of Section 127 of MRTP Act and land has become available to Petitioner to be used as permissible in law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the reservation of land under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act can lapse if the acquiring authority fails to take steps for acquisit....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a valid notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 for the lapsing of reservation of land....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.