IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
S.S. Shinde, N.R. Borkar, JJ.
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Ramraksha Chhatradhari Singh and Others – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No.456 of 2003
Decided On : 09-02-2022
Criminal Appeal - Acquittal - Section 302 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code - [MURDER] - [Indian Penal Code, Section 302, Section 34] - The court acquitted the accused of the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code due to lack of conclusive evidence and failure to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution accused two individuals of murdering a person named Vikram Shinde. The prosecution's case relied on circumstantial evidence as there were no eye witnesses to the alleged incident. The accused denied the charges and claimed to be falsely implicated. The trial court acquitted the accused due to the prosecution's failure to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence presented by the prosecution, including the testimony of police witnesses, contained material omissions and contradictions. The court noted that the prosecution did not produce conclusive evidence to support the charges against the accused.
Issues: The main issue was whether the prosecution could prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and witness testimony.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles of circumstantial evidence and the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. It emphasized the importance of corroborative evidence and the need to exclude every possible hypothesis except the guilt of the accused. The court also highlighted the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused and the requirement to give the benefit of doubt to the accused in case of evenly balanced views of the evidence.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the Criminal Appeal filed by the State against the order of acquittal, stating that the findings of acquittal were in line with the evidence presented and there was no perversity in the trial court's decision. The court concluded that the prosecution had failed to prove the case against the accused and upheld the order of acquittal.
JUDGMENT :
S. S. Shinde, J.
1. Keeping in view the law laid down by the Supreme Court, we have heard and considered this Appeal preferred by the Appellant/State against acquittal of the Respondents/Accused of the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code by the judgment and order dated 08/10/2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai in Sessions Case No.1382 of 1998.
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, can be stated thus :-
One Mr. Krishna Govind Choudhari, the Asstt Police Sub Inspector then attached to Aarey Sub Police Station, Moracha Pada Unit No.30, Aarey Colony, Goregaon (East) Mumbai 65, is the complainant. On the date of incident i.e. on 16/09/1998 at about 00.5 hrs in the night or so, he along with other police constables were on patrolling duty. They stopped their mobile van at Dinkarrao Desai Marg, Picnic Point near Aarrey Colony Chowk and started checking and verifying in-coming and out-going cars in the street light. At that time, the complainant had seen one car coming from Unit No.25 towards Dinkarrao Desai Road. At that time the road was lonely and therefore he decided to stop the said car. Accordingly he stopped the said car for checking. It was a white colour Fiat car bearing No.MH-01-U-7457. The person who was sitting on the driver seat gave his name as Jayashankar Mishra and the person sitting on the rear seat gave his name as Ramraksha Chhatadhari Singh. On inquiry, both of them told the police that they had gone to their relatives. In the mean time police naik Mr.Rane brought to the notice of police officer Choudhari i.e. the complainant that there was blood on the floor of the rear side door of the said car. Therefore Police Officer Choudhari suspected and asked both the persons to get down from the car. They got down. At that time, the complainant had seen blood stains on the shirt of Ramraksha Singh, who was sitting on the rear side of the car, so also he had seen the blood lying on the floor of the car. Therefore, the complainant passed on a message to North West Control Room. Accordingly Station House Officer of Aarey Sub Police Station Mr. Desai and Night Asstt. PI Mr. Pathan came to the spot i.e. Picnic spot. The said police officers made detailed inquiry with both the persons. They told the police officers that they had murdered one person by name Shinde and they had thrown away the dead body of Shinde in the forest of Aarey colony. Thereafter police called two panchas and recorded memorandum of Ramraksha Singh (Accused No.1) in the presence of panchas. Thereafter, accused No.1 led police party and panchas to the spot and pointed out a dead body lying on the left side of the road on western side in the bushes. A clutch wire of the motor-cycle was seen around the neck of the dead person by police officer Mr. Desai. He had also seen blood stains on the mouth and clothes of the deceased. Thereafter police removed the body of the said person Shinde and sent to Cooper Hospital where the doctor on duty declared the said Shinde as dead after examining him before admission. Therefore, the complainant passed on a message regarding the death of said Shinde to North West Control Room and asked them to send police officers to Cooper Hospital. The then police sub Inspector Mr. Rajendra Laxman Desai (PW-10) was on duty as a station house officer in the intervening night of 15/09/1998 and 16/09/1998. Upon receiving the telephonic message from North West Control Room, he had gone to Picnic Point along with police officer Pathan, and after the injured Shinde was sent to Cooper Hospital in mobile van with the police officer choudhari (PW-1), he had drawn the spot cum seizure panchanama. Thereafter he along with police officer Pathan came to police station. At that time he received a phone from Cooper Hospital that the injured succumbed to the injuries before he was admitted to the hospital. Thereafter he and API Pathan went to Cooper Hospital, where he recorded the com
Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra
Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab
Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P.
Bishan Singh v. State of Punjab
C. Antony v. K.G. Raghavan Nair
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
Harijana Thirupala v. Public Prosecutor
K. Gopal Reddy v. State of A.P.
Khedu Mohton v. State of Bihar
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra
Madan Mohan Singh v. State of U.P.
Murlidhar @ Gidda vs. State of Karnataka
Noor Khan v. State of Rajasthan
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v/s. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.