A.K.MENON, R.N.LADDHA
Pratap Yeshwant Kanolkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
A.K. MENON, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent taken up for hearing and final disposal. The learned Additional Government Advocate waives service on behalf of the State and the learned Central Government Standing Counsel, waives service on behalf of the Central Government.
3. This common order disposes the above Writ Petitions and Civil Application No. 1660 of 2021 (F) filed in Writ Petition No. 1149 of 2021. The factual aspects in each of these Writ Petitions are set out in brief.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1119 OF 2021(F)
4. The six petitioners claim as owners of lands engaged in cultivation. They claim that the income that they derive from the agriculture is their only source. They will be gravely prejudiced and lose their only source of income if the lands are acquired. The petitioners challenge the process of acquisition of land initiated by the Union of India under the National Highways Act, 1956 (Highways Act) proposing to construct a link road (new NH-166S) from NH-66 (old NH17) near Dhargalim to Mopa near Varconda in the State of Goa. The petitioners also challenge an order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the Competent Au
Chairman, Indore Vikas Pradhikaran Vs. Pure Industrial Coke and Chemicals Ltd.
Competent Authority Vs. Barangore Jute Factory & Others
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs. Darius Shapur Chenai & Others
Hanuman Laxman Aroskar Vs. Union Of India
Ramniklal N. Bhutta & Another Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others (1997) 1 SCC 134
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.