SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. KHANWILKAR, B.R. GAVAI, KRISHNA MURARI, JJ.
The Project Director, Project Implementation Unit – Appellant
Versus
P.V. Krishnamoorthy & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 3976-3977, 3978-3980, 3981-3984, 3985-3991, 3992, 3993-3994, 3995-3998, 3999-4001 of 2020, Arising Out of SLP (C) Nos. 13384-13385, 16098-16100, 18577-18580, 18586, 19160-19166 of 2019, 1775-1776, 1777-1780, 1781-1783 of 2020
Decided On : 08-12-2020
National Highways Act, 1956 - Section 3A(1) - Acquisition of specified lands - Construction - Project (Bharatmala Pariyojna Phase I) has been conceived as a new umbrella program for highways sector that focuses on optimising efficiency of freight and passenger movement across country by bridging critical infrastructure gaps through effective interventions like development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors and Feeder Routes (ICFR), National Corridor Efficiency Improvement, Border and International connectivity roads, Coastal and Port connectivity roads and Green-field expressways, traversing across around 24,800 kms in Phase-I - In addition, Phase I also includes 10,000 kms. of balance road works under National Highways Development Program - Estimated outlay for Phase I came to be specified as Rs.5,35,000 crores spread over 5 years - Objective of Program is stated as optimal resource allocation for a holistic highway development/improvement initiative - Two distinguishing features are said to be - Effective delegation in appraisal/approval of individual project stretches and encouraging State Governments to participate in development process through Grand Challenge – Whether Writ Petitions are maintainable, since all that has been done by respondents is to notify their intention to acquire lands by publishing a notification under Section 3A(1) of Act and petitioners cannot be stated to be aggrieved - Held, Court need to place on record that Court have not dilated on other decisions adverted to and relied upon before by learned counsel appearing for concerned parties, to avoid prolixity and also because same have no bearing on questions dealt with by us hitherto - In Court opinion, appeals filed by authorities ought to succeed merely on issues answered by for dismissing challenge to notifications under Section 2(2) and Section 3A of 1956 Act, in concerned writ petitions - Further, Court do not wish to deal with decisions relied upon, that Project of this nature may have environmental impact and ought not to be taken forward - As aforesaid, Court have not examined efficacy of permissions/clearances granted by competent authority under environment or forest laws, as case may be - There shall be no order as to costs. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals emanate from the common judgment and order 1 [dated 8.4.2019 in W.P. Nos. 16146/2018, 16630/2018, 16961/2018, 19063/2018, 19385/2018, 20014/2018, 20194/2018, 20625/2018, 20626/2018, 20627/2018, 20647/2018, 20764/2018, 20969/2018, 21242/2018, 22334/2018 and 22371/2018 for short "the impugned judgment"] of the High Court of Judicature at Madras 2 [for short "the High Court"] holding the notifications issued under Section 3A(1) of the National Highways Act, 1956 3 [for short "the 1956 Act"] for acquisition of specified lands for development/construction of Chennai-Krishnagiri-Salem (National Corridor) 8 Lanes new National Highway 4 [for short "C-K-S (NC)"] (NH-179A and NH-179B) being part of the larger project - "Bharatmala Pariyojna Phase-I 5 [for short "the Project"], as illegal and bad in law on the grounds stated in the impugned judgment.
THE PROJECT
3. The Project (Bharatmala Pariyojna - Phase I) has been conceived as a new umbrella program for the highways sector that focuses on optimising efficiency of freight and passenger movement across the country by bridging critical infrastructure gaps through effective interventions like development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors and Feeder Routes (ICFR), National Corridor Efficiency Improvement, Border and International connectivity roads, Coastal and Port connectivity roads and Green-field expressways, traversing across around 24,800 kms in Phase-I. In addition, Phase I also includes 10,000 kms. of balance road works under National Highways Development Program 6 [for short, "NHDP"]. The estimated outlay for Phase I came to be specified as Rs.5,35,000 crores spread over 5 years. The objective of the Program is stated as optimal resource allocation for a holistic highway development/improvement initiative. The two distinguishing features are said to be - effective delegation in appraisal/approval of individual project stretches and encouraging State Governments to participate in the development process through 'Grand Challenge'. This Project intends to further the objective of the NHDP, which was being implemented in the past and had reached level of maturity. Resultantly, it was thought appropriate to redefine road development and have a macro approach while planning expansion of the national highways network with focus on recasting road development by bridging critical infrastructure gaps. The Program envisages a corridor approach in place of the existing package-based approach which has, in many cases, resulted in skewed development referred to therein, causing impediment in seamless freight and passenger movement.
4. The components and outlay of the Project, as approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs 7 [for short "the CCEA"] to be implemented over a period of 5 years i.e. 2017-2018 to 2021-2022, provide for the breakup of length of the different components and the outlay therefor. Although the Project stretches had been identified taking into account integration of economic corridors with the ongoing projects under NHDP and infrastructure asymmetry in major corridors, an express discretion has been bestowed on Minister - Road Transport & Highways to substitute/replace upto 15% length of 24,800 kms. for the Project (Phase-I of program) by other suitable projects, if development of certain identified stretches cannot be taken up on account of issues pertaining to alignment finalisation, land availability and other unforeseen factors whilst retaining the target and budget proposed for Phase I.
5. In furtherance of the Project, a meeting was held on 19.1.2018 under the Chairmanship of Secretary (Road Transport & Highways) for optimising Economic Corridors in the State of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala identified under the Project, which was also attended by Member (P), National Highway
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.