V. K. JADHAV, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
Laxmikant – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Leave to insert Sec. 377 of the Indian Penal Code in prayer clause [B] alongwith other Sec. .
2. Heard fnally with consent at the admission stage.
3. Learned Counsel for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application of applicant Nos.1 to 3.
4. Leave granted.
5. Application of applicant No.1 Laxmikant Kachru Kahar (husband of respondent No.2.), applicant No.2 Kachru Laxman Kahar (father-in-law of respondent No.2) and applicant No. 3 Vimal Kachru Kahar (mother-in-law of respondent No.2) is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
6. The applicants before us are seeking quashing of the F.I.R. bearing Crime No.55 of 2021 registered with Loni Police Station, Taluka Rahata, District Ahmednagar for the offences punishable under Ss. 498-A, 406, 323, 354, 504, 506 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
7. Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that applicant Nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7 are the married sisters-in-law of respondent No.2. They are residing at different places alongwith their respective husbands. Applicant No.8 is the daughter of applicant No. 4 Sindhu. Learned Counsel submits that though there are allegations against them by referring the incident a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.