IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AURANGABAD BENCH
V.K. Jadhav, Sandipkumar C.More, JJ.
Shaikh Taslim Shaikh Hakim - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Application No. 166 of 2022
Decided On : 29-03-2022
QUASHING - MATRIMONIAL DISPUTE - Indian Penal Code, section 498(A), 323, 504, 506 - Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, section 2 - Family Courts Act, 1984, section 7(1)(b) - Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act - Madras High Court case - Guidelines for quashing criminal proceedings - Interpretation of Muslim Personal Law
Fact of the Case:
The applicant seeks quashing of FIR and charge-sheet as the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement after getting separated by mutual consent and declaring their status in the Family Court. The respondent received maintenance and is not interested in prosecuting the applicant.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled and approached the Family Court for declaration of their status. The court applied the guidelines for quashing criminal proceedings based on settlement and interpreted the Muslim Personal Law to declare the marriage status as dissolved by mutual consent.
Issues: Quashing of FIR and charge-sheet, application of Muslim Personal Law, voluntary settlement of parties
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the guidelines for quashing criminal proceedings based on settlement and interpreted the Muslim Personal Law to declare the marriage status as dissolved by mutual consent.
Final Decision: The Criminal Application was allowed and disposed of in favor of the applicant.
ORDER
1. Heard finally with the consent of learned Counsels for the parties at the admission stage.
2. The applicant/accused is seeking quashing of FIR bearing Crime No.514 of 2021, registered with Police Station Nanalpeth, Parbhani for the offences punishable under sections 498(A), 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and also consequential charge-sheet bearing RCC No. 178 of 2022, pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Parbhani, on the ground that the parties have arrived at amicable settlement.
3. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant - husband and respondent No.2 - wife got separated by mutual consent and accordingly approached the Family Court, Parbhani for declaration of their matrimonial status in terms of provisions of section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 read with section 7(1)(b) Explanation (b) of the Family Courts Act, 1984. By judgment and order dated 09.03.2022 learned Judge of the Family Court at Parbhani had allowed the petition and declared their status as they are no more husband and wife in terms of the mutual agreement between them. It is further agreed between the parties that the applicant-husband shall pay an amount of Rs.5 lakhs to respondent No.2 as the amount for future maintenance in total. Learned Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that respondent No.2 has filed consent affidavit-in-reply and she also received said amount of Rs.5 lakhs. Learned Counsel for respondent No.2 submits that respondent No.2 is not interested in prosecuting the applicant in connection with aforesaid crime and continue with the criminal proceedings arising out of said crime.
4. We have heard learned APP for the respondent/State. Learned APP Mr. Dande has placed before us a case of Madras High Court in C.R.P.(NPD) No.161 of 2021, wherein the Madras High Court by referring the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Mst. Zohara Khatoon Vs. Mohd. Ibrahim, (1981) 2 SCC 509, submits that mubarat is a form of extra-judicial divorce based on mutual consent under Islamic Law and same is valid, as it remains untouched by the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act. The Madras High Court in para No. 17 of the judgment as made following observations :-
"17. Coming to the present case on hand, the learned Principal District Munsif, Alandur has refused to entertain the petition in the light of provisions under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC and the Judgment of High Court of Karnataka in Miscellaneous First Appeal No.200834/2019(FC) [Zuber Vs. Mahezabeen] and the same is challenged in the present revision. It appears that the petitioner filed O.S. before the learned Principal District Munsif at Alandur to declare that the Marriage solemnized between the petitioner and respondent on 01.12.2018 to be dissolved in terms of MOU entered between them. However, the same was returned several times for want of several reasons and thereafter, the said petition was dismissed even without numbering the petition. As already mentioned supra, the Hon'ble Division Bench of High Court of Kerala at Ernakulaam, had categorically held that 'mubaraat' is a form of an extra-judicial divorce based on mutual consent under Islamic law and same is valid, as it remains untouched by the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act. The court below, in such circumstances, is neither called upon to adjudicate nor called upon to dissolve the marriage by decree of divorce. On the other hand, the Family Court only has to declare the maritial stauts by endorsing the mubaraat invoking jurisdiction under Explanation (b) of Section 7(1) of the Family Courts Act. Once a declaration of joint divorce invoking bubaraat is produced before the Family Court, the Family Court has to pass a decree declaring the matrimonial status of the parties. The inquiry in such cases is limited to the extent to find out whether both parties have agreed upon to dissolve such marriage invoking mubaraat. Once the Family Court is satisfied that
AI
The court applied the guidelines for quashing criminal proceedings based on settlement and interpreted the Muslim Personal Law to declare the marriage status as dissolved by mutual consent.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the nature and gravity of the crime, and the impact on society, when deciding to quash criminal proceedings based on settlement, as outlined in the ....
Mutual consent under Muslim Personal Law allows for divorce without judicial intervention if both parties agree, as established in the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the marriage between the parties already stood dissolved by way of Mubarat as per Muslim Law, as recorded in the settlement.
(1) Family Court is competent to entertain suit seeking declaration regarding validity of marriage as also regarding matrimonial status of any person.(2) Dissolution of marriage by way of Mubaraat un....
The court affirmed that extra-judicial divorce via Mubaraat is valid and must be recognized by Family Courts, empowering them to declare marital status under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.