Back
SANDEEP V. MARNE
Mehra & Company, Through its Partner, Mr. Shailendra Mahendraprasad Mehra – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This application is filed for appointment of arbitrator under sub section 6 of section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1996" for the sake of brevity).
2. The relevant clauses of the agreement between the parties under which appointment of arbitrator is sought are as under :-
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of specific terms like 'arbitration' or 'arbitrator' in the clauses and the provision of departmental remedies indicated the absen....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that clauses empowering an engineer to take decisions and providing for an appeal do not necessarily constitute a valid arbitration agreement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of party autonomy in arbitration, the enforceability of the entire arbitration clause, and the conditional acceptance of arbitration....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of written consent for arbitration, the effect of the appointment of an arbitrator, and the availability of statutory remedies under....
Appointment of arbitrator by designation is permissible. Arbitration clauses in government contracts providing that an employee of the department will be the sole arbitrator are neither void nor unen....
The judgment establishes the requirement of a written agreement for arbitration, the interpretation of settlement of disputes clauses, and the significance of party conduct in determining the existen....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
