R. D. DHANUKA, M. M. SATHAYE
Hanif Musa Kazi – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.M.SATHAYE, J.
1. Rule. The learned AGP waives service for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Adv. Mangale waives service for Resp. No. 2. Rule made returnable forthwith. The Petition is heard finally by consent of the parties.
2. By this Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India, the Petitioner seeks writ of Certiorari for quashing and setting aside order dated 25th November 2021 passed by the Respondent No. 3- Collector, Ratnagiri, exercising powers under Section 16(1)(1C)(b) and other enabling provisions of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Township Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”), thereby disqualifying the Petitioner from being a member of Respondent No. 2 -Municipal Council or to be elected as such, from 22nd May 2017, for a period of 6 years.
3. The brief facts of the case, necessary for disposal of this Petition are as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.