Back
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Union of India, General Manager, Central Railway, CST, Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Shriram Zolbaji Bandhe – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By preferring this appeal appellant -General Manager, Central Railway, CST, Mumbai has challenged the judgment and award passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, in Claim Application No.56/OA-II/RCT/NGP/2006, dated 24.7.2009 Nagpur Bench Nagpur, whereby the claim of compensation was allowed by granting compensation at the sum of Rs.4,00,000/-. Present appellant is the original respondent preferred this appeal on the ground that the lady was running from bridge in order to catch the train in spite of instructions, she tried to board into the train and as a result came under the wheels. Thus, the deceased while attempting to catch the train felled down, sustained injuries and succumbed to the death. It is the contention of the appellant that it is not an untoward incident, but it is a self inflicted injury due to the negligence of the deceased and, therefore, railway is not liable to pay compensation to the respondents. However, learned trial Court has not considered the same and wrongly awarded the compensation.
2. Whereas, as per the contention of the respondents said accident took place when deceased was boarding in the train and succumbed to the death, she accidentally
Absence of a train ticket does not negate the status of a bona fide passenger, provided there is sufficient corroborative evidence to support the journey claim.
The interpretation of the term 'untoward incident' and the concept of a bonafide passenger under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act and Railways Act.
The principle of strict liability and the need for a purposive interpretation of legal provisions to ensure compensation for victims of train accidents.
Bona fide passengers holding valid tickets are entitled to compensation for accidental falls, irrespective of which train they used, under the Railways Act.
Claimants are entitled to compensation for death due to a railway accident despite a lack of eyewitnesses, based on strict liability principles.
Negligence of a deceased passenger does not affect the strict liability for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, as accidental falls while boarding a train are deemed untoward inciden....
In railway accident claims, initial burden of proof lies with claimants to show deceased was a bona fide passenger; burden shifts to Railways upon their demonstration of bona fides, with strict liabi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a liberal and wider interpretation of the Railways Act to advance its object, emphasizing the principle of strict liability and the re....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
