Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
K. R. SHRIRAM, KAMAL KHATA
Reliance Communication Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra P. Bansal – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
K.R. Shriram, J.
1. The preliminary issue that falls for consideration in the present Interim Application is whether respondent can be allowed to withdraw the monies deposited by appellant pursuant to this Court’s order dated 10th December 2012 towards stay of execution of the impugned judgment given that appellant is undergoing CIRP.
2. Appellant is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is, inter alia, engaged in the business of telecommunication services. Appellant is undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) pursuant to the order dated 15th May 2018 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai (“NCLT”) in C.P. No.(I.B.) 1387 (MB) of 2017. Appellant is being represented in the present proceedings through its Resolution Professional.
The court affirmed that a decree can be issued based on admissions where debts owed are settled through an approved resolution plan, allowing the security deposit to be recovered unconditionally.
The court ruled that the NCLAT erred in approving a settlement without adhering to the procedural requirements of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the collective nature of insolvency p....
(1) Plea of alternative remedy is a self-imposed restriction by superior Courts and is never an absolute bar unless barred by statute.
(2) Application under Section 12A of Insolvency and Bankruptc....
Interest on decreed amounts will not cease upon deposit in a court other than the executing court; actual payment to the decree holder is required to stop interest accrual.
The court ruled that claims for specific performance and damages relating to a project stalled due to insolvency are classified as debts under IBC; thus, their pursuit is barred during insolvency pro....
Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd. V/s. State of Karnataka
-
Read summaryGujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. V/s. Amit Gupta
-
Read summaryRoshanlal Kuthalia V/s. R.B. Mohan Singh Oberoi
-
Read summaryBank of India V/s. Vijay Transport & Ors.
-
Read summaryChitra Sharma V/s. Union of India
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.