K. R. SHRIRAM, KAMAL KHATA
Reliance Communication Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra P. Bansal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.R. Shriram, J.
1. The preliminary issue that falls for consideration in the present Interim Application is whether respondent can be allowed to withdraw the monies deposited by appellant pursuant to this Court’s order dated 10th December 2012 towards stay of execution of the impugned judgment given that appellant is undergoing CIRP.
2. Appellant is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is, inter alia, engaged in the business of telecommunication services. Appellant is undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) pursuant to the order dated 15th May 2018 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai (“NCLT”) in C.P. No.(I.B.) 1387 (MB) of 2017. Appellant is being represented in the present proceedings through its Resolution Professional.
3. Respondent in the abovementioned First Appeal, who is applicant in the Interim Application, is a former employee of appellant.
4. LIST OF DATES AND EVENTS :
| Sr. No. | Date | Particulars |
| 1. | 29th November 2001 | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.