SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND M. M. SATHAYE
Akshay Anant Matkar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.M.SATHAYE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service for Respondent No. 1 & Respondent No. 2. Taken up for final disposal with consent of parties.
2. This matter was initially heard along with Criminal Public Interest Litigation No. 15 of 2022, in which notices were issued on 7th February, 2023 and learned Counsel for the Petitioner in Criminal PIL was directed to supply spare copy in the Registry and condition was imposed that if such spare copy is not supplied within the stipulated time, the Criminal PIL will stand dismissed for non prosecution without further reference to the Court. Today when the matter is listed before us and argued, there is a office note dated 29th March, 2023 stating that as per order dated 7th February, 2023 the Advocate for the Petitioner has not supplied spare copy in said Criminal PIL and therefore, the conditional orders stands, which means that the said Criminal PIL has been dismissed without further reference to the Court, as on today. In such situation the present Criminal Writ Petition is pressed before us by learned Counsel for the Petitioner and it is argued finally
3. This is a Petition filed under Article 2
Dr. K.R. Lakshmanan Vs. State of T.N. and Anr (1996) 2 SCC 226
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.