IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
Laura Entwistle – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
Writ Petition No.8518, 9265 of 2009
Decided on : 08-03-2023
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section (u/s) 10(23C)(vi) - Internal Revenue Code - 501©(3) - Income Tax - Trust Deed - Assessment Year - During years under consideration, ASB was supported by South Asia International and Educational Services Foundation (SAIESF) - SAIESF was set-up in 1996 in United State of America wholly and exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within meaning of section 501©(3) of Internal Revenue Code of United States of America, and primary purpose is to provide financial assistance to educational institution as provided in its constitution. SAIESF was a non profit organization, subject to scrutiny by US Government and exempted from tax payment by US Federal Government - Accounts of SAIESF were subject to detailed scrutiny by IRS. By an order based on said scrutiny, IRS continued to approve SAIESF as a non-for-profit foundation – Held, respondents can certainly monitor funds and take necessary action in accordance with law if not invested as per Section 11(5) of Act - Under that proviso, if prescribed authority is satisfied that trust, fund, university or other educational institution etc. has not applied its income in accordance with third proviso or if it finds that such institution, trust or fund etc. has not invested/deposited its funds in accordance with third proviso or that activities of such funds or institution or trust etc., are not genuine or that its activities are not being carried out in accordance with the conditions subject to which approval is granted that the prescribed authority is empowered to withdraw approval earlier granted after complying with the procedure mentioned therein - Court find no merit in the contentions of the respondents and consequently allow petition in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) - Petition is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
KAMAL KHATA, J.
1. These two Writ Petitions are filed by the same petitioners for different assessment years. The Writ Petition No. 8518 of 2009 pertains to Assessment Year (AY) 2002 – 03 and AY 2003 – 04 and the Writ Petition No. 9265 of 2009 pertains to AY 2004 – 05 and AY 2005 – 06. Since the facts and the issue arising in both these petitions is common we shall dispose of the same with a common order by adverting to facts from the Writ Petition No. 8518 of 2009 for brevity.
2. The petitioners, the present trustees of the American School of Bombay Education Trust, (‘ASB’ for short) have filed the present petition to set aside the impugned order dated 27th February 2009 passed by respondent no.4 and to direct the respondents to grant them the exemption to the income that was rejected by the impugned order under Section (u/s) 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) in relation to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2002-03 to A.Y. 2005-06.
3. The ASB is constituted under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, vide the trust deed, as amended in July-1995 and August-2008. The ASB was set up after the embassy of the United States of America was granted specific permission by the Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi. The Trust is set-up solely for the purpose of education and not for the purpose of profit. The relevant extract of the recital of the Trust Deed is reiterated as under-
4. Further, the Trustees hold the Trust Fund solely for the purpose of education as is set out by clause 3, which provides as under-
5. During the years under consideration, ASB was supported by the South Asia International and Educational Services Foundation (SAIESF). SAIESF was set-up in 1996 in the United State of America wholly and exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States of America, and the primary purpose is to provide financial assistance to educational institution as provided in its constitution. SAIESF was a non profit organization, subject to scrutiny by the US Government and exempted from tax payment by US Federal Government u/s. 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The accounts of SAIESF were subject to detailed scrutiny by the IRS.
American Hotel & Lodging Association, Educational Institute v/s. CBDT
Corpus contributions towards capital expenditure like school construction excluded from aggregate annual receipts under section 10(23C)(iiiad); educational institution eligible for exemption if recei....
The necessity for specific findings on the educational purpose of institutions is essential for approval under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.