DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, KAMAL KHATA
Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Private Limited, Through its Authorized Signatory and Director, Mr. Vivek Shrikrishna Pandit – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Through the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Kamal Khata, J.)
1. By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned rejection order dated 3rd August 2021 passed by Respondent no. 2 whereby the Miscellaneous Application (‘MA’) filed by the Petitioner under section (‘u/s’) 254 (2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (‘Act’) was stated as not covered under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 (‘DTVSV-A’) as it was not filed in pursuance of an appeal ‘dismissed in limine’. It also seeks a mandamus against the Respondent No. 2 to issue an acknowledgment in Form 3 against the application made by the Petitioner in Form 1 and Form 2 under section 4 of DTVSVA read with Rule 3 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Rules 2020 (‘DTVSV-R’).
FACTS:
2. On 31st October 2009 the petitioner filed it's original e-return of income for the assessment year (‘AY’) 2009-10 whereby it declared a total income of Rs.16,27,70,190/-. On 11th August 2010 the petitioner revised it's ITR, to declare an income of Rs.16,15,96,380/-. On 29th March 2011 the revised ITR was processed u/s 143 (1) of the Act resulting in refund of Rs.1,50,46,150/-. Its assessment was selected for scrutiny under Computer Assisted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.