MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
MUFG BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANMOHAN, J.
PRIMARY ISSUE
1. The primary issue that arises for consideration in the present case is whether an assessee is free to settle any appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (“DTVSV Act”) and is not required to settle all the pending appeals filed by the respondents-revenue for an assessment year.
RELEVANT FACTS
2. The relevant facts of the present case are that the Petitioner is a banking company incorporated under the laws of Japan and carries on the banking business in India through branches in various cities. The return of income filed by the petitioner was selected for scrutiny assessment and a final assessment order dated 29th October, 2010 under Section 143 read with Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’) was passed by the Assessing Officer for the Assessment Year 2007-08 making various adjustments to the total income of the Petitioner.
3. The Petitioner challenged the assessment order by filing an appeal before the Tribunal which was disposed of vide order dated 19th September, 2014 deciding the various issues as under:
Associated Cement Co. vs. Their Workmen
B. Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court
B.P. Khemka Pvt. Ltd. vs. Birendrakumar Bhomick
Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot vs. Shatrusailya Digvijaysingh Jadeja
Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai vs. Dilip Kumar and Company and Others
Central Rly. Workshop, Jhansi vs. Vishwanath
Edukanti Kistamma vs. So. Venkatareddy
Kooka Sidhwa and Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Raghuraj Singh vs. Hari Kishan
Surendra Kumar Verma vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum Labour Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.