NITIN JAMDAR, SANDEEP V. MARNE
Sachin Namdev Wadgaye – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Housing area and Development Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep V. Marne, J.
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties, petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. Petitioner has filed present petition challenging order dated 27 August 2021 promoting Respondent No.3 to the post of Information and Communication Technology Officer. Petitioner seeks his own promotion to that post in place of Respondent No.3. He also seeks a direction to call for records relating to involvement of Respondent No.3 in respect of alleged fabrication of tender for renewal of Oracle license to LDS Infotech Pvt. Ltd. as well as report submitted by the Vigilance Committee on 29 January 2020. He also challenges the recruitment rules to the extent of prescription of Decree in Management as qualification for promotion to the post of Information and Communication Technology Officer.
3. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that Petitioner has been working on the post of Information and Communication Technology Officer (ICT Officer) since 3 May 2012. Respondent No.3 came to be appointed on the post of ICT Officer w.e.f. 23 July 2012
Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha & Anr. Vs. Dr. K. Santhakumari
Maharashtra Public Service Commission v. Sandeep Shriram Warade
State of Mysore v. Syed Mahmood [AIR 1968 SC 1113 : (1968) 3 SCR 363 : (1970) 1 LLJ 370]
Union of India v. Mohan Lal Capoor [(1973) 2 SCC 836 : 1974 SCC (L&S) 5]
Union Public Service Commission Vs. L. P. Tiwari & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.