Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
Pradeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, J.
By way of present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following substantive relief:-
“(i) That impugned Annexure A-4 may kindly be quashed and set aside with further directions to the respondents to give appointment to the applicant who was recommended along with all other candidates in DPC held on 30.05.2003 with all consequential benefits of pay, seniority etc.”
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the key facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as Junior Draughtsman in the year, 1997 with the respondents- Department and had acquired the qualification of AMIE in September, 1999. The respondent-Department forwarded a memorandum for convening Departmental Promotion Committee (hereinafter referred to as DPC) for filling up of vacant/anticipated posts of Assistant Engineer (Civil), that arose in the year 2002 to respondent No.3-Commission to consider the eligible candidates for promotion as on 01.01.2002. The name of the petitioner was also forwarded for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil), since he was found eligible as per the requirement laid down in Para 16.8 of the Handbook on Personnel Matters, Vol.-I, wherein it has
Appointing authority cannot selectively reject DPC recommendations for eligible candidate while accepting for others without following Handbook procedure for disagreement; must ensure equal treatment....
Amended promotion rules' 45% quota for Junior Engineers with 7 years service contains no Diploma/Degree requirement; unqualified seniors eligible; DPC rejection on qualification grounds invalid.
Promotion eligibility must be based on fairness and non-arbitrariness, ensuring all eligible candidates are considered regardless of category.
The court affirmed that promotion must consider merit as the primary criterion, and procedural flaws in disciplinary inquiries can invalidate corresponding punishment orders.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the requisition for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) was sent in compliance with the statutory rules, and the Rules, 1968 p....
Promotion rights are not absolute; retrospective promotions require clear vacancies and adherence to procedural rules, which were not met in this case.
Point of Law : Public orders made by public authorities are meant to have public effect and are intended to effect actings and conduct of those to whom they are addressed and must be construed object....
Promotions take effect from the date granted, not from the date of vacancy, and retrospective seniority cannot be assigned.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
