IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
XYZ - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department and Anr. - Respondents
Writ Petition No.6340 Of 2023
Decided On : 20-06-2023
Pregnancy Termination - Minor Girl - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, Indian Penal Code - MTP Act, Juvenile Justice Act
Fact of the Case:
The biological mother of a 15-year-old minor girl filed a petition seeking permission to terminate the pregnancy of her daughter, who had conceived as a result of a crime under the POCSO Act and the Indian Penal Code.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the medical reports indicating that a live baby would be born prematurely and discussed the implications of forcibly terminating the pregnancy. It also addressed the future health and development of the child, ultimately deciding to allow the natural delivery and providing options for the care and adoption of the child.
Issues: The court deliberated on whether to permit the termination of pregnancy when a live child would be born prematurely and the future of the child's health and development.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the duty to ensure the best interest and care for the child if born alive, as per the MTP Act, Juvenile Justice Act, and constitutional provisions on the right to life and human dignity.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition, allowing the natural delivery and providing options for the care and adoption of the child, in line with the best interests of the child.
ORDER :
1. By this petition, the biological mother of minor girl child aged 15 years, has preferred this petition and has put forth prayer clauses (B), (C) and (D) as under:-
(C) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or directions to the respondent No.2 to examine the petitioner by the medical committee and to submit decision/report to this Hon’ble Court as early as possible.
(D) Pending hearing and final disposal of this writ petition, directions may be issued to the respondent No.2 to constitute medical committee and to examine the petitioner and to submit the report to this Hon’ble Court.
2. While referring the pregnant girl for a medical test with the Government Medical College and Hospital, Jalgaon, we had observed in our order dated 14.06.2023 in paragraph 5 as under.
3. On 16.06.2023, we had passed the following order:-
2. We request the learned AGP to call for such report.
3. The communication received by Mr. Tambe dated 15.06.2023, which is in the form of an opinion of the Medical Board, is taken on record and marked as “X-1” for identification.
4. The said report indicates that considering the mental and physical status of the girl, who is a minor, it would be appropriate to grant permission to terminate the pregnancy. However, in the very next sentence, the Board submits that a live child will be born and if it is taken care of in NICU, there is every chance that the child would remain alive.
5. Considering the peculiar circumstances and the opinion of the Medical Board that a live child with a beating heart would be born and which can survive, the question is, whether to resort to termination of pregnancy when a live child will be born prematurely on account of induced labour or allow a full term baby to be born.
6. The learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks time till Monday, 19th June, 2023 to take instructions.
7. Stand over to 19th June, 2023 in the passing orders category.”
4. The complete report in “Form-D” of the Medical Board for pregnancy termination, is placed before us. The five doctor’s board has set out/opined in the report (undated) that the baby is around 28 weeks as per the USG scan which was performed on 15.06.2023. It is also expressed that a live baby would be born and it would have to be admitted in NICU. Surgical intervention would be necessary. Blood and blood products transfusion would be required and the lady will have to be admitted in the ICU. It is also expressed that there is a risk to the pregnant lady while performing the termination of pregnancy.
5. The learned Advocate for the biological mother submits on instructions that the girl was subjected to a physical crime and therefore, she
The paramount duty to ensure the best interest and care for a child if born alive, as mandated by the MTP Act, Juvenile Justice Act, and constitutional provisions on the right to life and human digni....
The court cannot permit medical termination of pregnancy at an advanced gestational stage if a duly constituted Medical Board concludes that such a procedure poses a serious threat to the life and he....
The consent of a minor's guardian is required for pregnancy termination under the MTP Act, but the minor's autonomy and decision regarding her reproductive choices must be prioritized by the court.
The court reinforced the importance of maternal health and autonomy in pregnancy decisions, particularly regarding late-term terminations, while promoting adoption as a viable alternative.
The court permitted the termination of a minor's pregnancy beyond the statutory limit due to mental trauma and lack of fetal abnormalities, emphasizing judicial discretion in sensitive cases.
The court emphasized the balance between a woman's autonomy in reproductive choices and the medical risks associated with advanced pregnancy, directing a re-examination by a different Medical Board.
Reproductive and bodily autonomy of pregnant woman, even former minor, prevails over viable foetus rights; court cannot compel unwanted pregnancy continuation causing trauma, permitting termination b....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.