IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
M.S. JAWALKAR, J.
The Regional Manager, Union Bank of India and Anr. – Applicants
Versus
M/s. Punya Coal Road Lines, A proprietorship concern and Ors. – Respondents
Civil Revision Application No. 05 Of 2021 And Civil Revision Application No. 04 Of 2021
Decided On : 05-06-2023
The court analyzed the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) and relevant case law to determine the jurisdiction of the civil court in matters related to the classification of loan accounts as NPA. It concluded that the reliefs sought by the plaintiffs fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiffs filed a suit against the bank alleging illegal actions and breach of guidelines in classifying their loan account as NPA. They sought various reliefs including declaration, injunction, and damages. The bank argued that the suit should be rejected as the jurisdiction of the civil court is barred under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act. The court considered the arguments and cited relevant case law to determine the jurisdiction of the civil court in such matters. It concluded that the reliefs sought by the plaintiffs fall within the domain of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and that the civil court's jurisdiction is excluded. The court allowed the bank's application and rejected the plaintiffs' suit.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and relevant case law to determine the jurisdiction of the civil court in matters related to the classification of loan accounts as NPA. It concluded that the reliefs sought by the plaintiffs fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the DRT and that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The jurisdiction of the civil court is excluded in matters related to the classification of loan accounts as NPA under the SARFAESI Act. The reliefs sought by the plaintiffs fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the DRT.
Result: The court allowed the bank's application and rejected the plaintiffs' suit.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard.
2. Since the subject matter of both the Revision Applications are same, both are disposed of by common judgment.
3. Since the Civil Revision Application No. 05/2021 is treated as lead Revision Application, the facts and contentions of the said Revision Application are set out hereunder for proper adjudication of the issue involved in both the Revision Applications.
4. The present Revision Applications is filed by original Defendant - Union Bank of India being aggrieved by the order dated 11/11/2020 passed by the learned 10th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur below Exhibit 23 in Special Civil Suit No.69/2020.
5. The brief facts for filing of present Revision Application are as under:-
The Applicant No.1 is the Regional Manager, original Defendant No. 1 and Applicant No. 2 is Assistant General Manager of Union Bank of India - Defendant No.2. The Respondents herein are the original Plaintiffs in the Special Civil Suit No.69/2020. It is submitted that Respondent No.1 is a proprietary concern of Respondent No.2. Respondent No.4 is a Company registered under the Companies Act. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are the Directors and Promoters of Respondent No.4. It is the case of the Applicants herein that Respondent No.1 concern had availed various credit facilities from the Applicant - Bank since the year 2010 and the same were renewed and enhanced time to time and it was lastly sanctioned, renewed and enhanced to the extent of Rs.40 Crores (Rupees Forty Crores) by way of sanction letter dated 24/05/2015. In order to secure the said credit facilities, the Respondents had executed various security documents and the loan agreements in favour of Bank and also secured the said credit facilities by mortgaging their immovable properties by executing a simple Registered Mortgage dated 26/05/2015 and thereby created the security interest of the Applicant - Bank over their immovable properties. After availing and utilizing the aforesaid credit facilities of Rs.40 Crores (Rupees Forty Crores), the Respondents had committed default in operating the loan accounts as per the terms and conditions of the sanction letter and loan agreements. As a result of which, the loan accounts of the Respondent No.1 became N.P.A. as on 30/11/2017, as per directives and guidelines issued by Reserve Bank of India and the amount of Rs.20,36,06,163.24 was due and outstanding against the Respondents as on 30/11/2017. Left with no alternative, the Bank initiated the action for the recovery of its outstanding dues by exercising rights available against the Respondents under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “SARFAESI Act”). Accordingly, the Bank issued a demand notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act to the Respondents on 27/12/2017 and thereby called upon the Respondents to make outstanding payment within a period of 60 days. As there was no compliance of the said notice, the Applicant - Bank moved an Application under Section 14 before the District Magistrate Nagpur for grant of assistance for taking the physical possession of the mortgaged properties. The said Proceedings are pending before the District Magistrate, Nagpur. The Applicant – Bank, apart from this Application, filed a recovery suit before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur for recovery of Rs.19,67,50,000/- against the Respondents vide original Application LODG No.871/2019 which is pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur.
6. It is submitted that the outstanding amount of Rs.20 Crores against Respondents is the public money and the Applicant - Bank wants to recover it by adopting the legal and proper procedure as laid down under the provisions of SARFAESI Act. After initiation of the said recovery Proceedings, the Respondents have filed a Suit for declaration, permanent injunction and damages against the Applicant - Bank before the learned 10th Joint
Madhav Prasad Aggarwal & another vs. Axis Bank Limited & another (2019) 7 SCC 158
Nahar Industrial Enterprises Limited vs. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Limited (2009) 8 SCC 646
Shakti Bhog Food Industries Limited vs. Central Bank of India (2020) 17 SCC 260
State Bank of India vs. Sagar Deshmukh & others 2011 (3) Mh.L.J. 71
Padma Bhatt vs. Orbit Corporation 2017(6) Mh.L.J. 102
Venture Global Engineering vs. Satyam Computer Services Limited (2010) 8 SCC 660
Sudhir Mehta vs. C.B.I. (2009) 8 SCC 1
Mayar Ltd. vs. Owners & others (2006) 3 SCC 100
Ram Singh v. Gram Panchayat Mehal Kalan
Mardia Chemicals Ltd & others vs. Union of India & others
Electrosteel Castings Limited vs. UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited & others
Jagdish Singh vs. Heeralal & others
Allahabad Bank, Kolkata vs. Hemantkumar S/o. Omprakash Malpani
Yuth Development Co-operative Bank Ltd., Kolhapur vs. Balasaheb Dinkarrao Salokhe & others
Saleem Bhai & others vs. State of Maharashtra & others
Sree Surya Developers and Promoters vs. N. Sailesh Prasad & others
ICICI Bank Ltd. Mumbai vs. Anil Printers Ltd. & another
P.V. Guru Raj Reddy represented by GPA Laxmi Narayan Reddy & another vs. P. Neeradha Reddy & others
Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal since deceased through legal representatives & others (2019) 4 SCC 367
The jurisdiction of the civil court is excluded in matters related to the classification of loan accounts as NPA under the SARFAESI Act.
Civil courts lack jurisdiction over matters already proceeding under SARFAESI Act, reaffirming that disputes on NPA classifications must be resolved within DRT as per Sections 17 and 34 of the Act.
Rejection of plaint – Jurisdiction of Civil Court in respect of matters which do not fall within jurisdiction of DRT or DRAT under Sections 17 and 18 of SARFAESI Act is not ousted or barred under pro....
The civil court retains jurisdiction to adjudicate on the validity of sale and mortgage deeds under the SARFAESI Act, and a plaint cannot be partially rejected under Order VII Rule 11.
Civil courts lack jurisdiction under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act for matters within the DRT's purview, and vague fraud allegations do not suffice to maintain a civil suit.
Application against measures to recover secured debts – Jurisdiction - Jurisdiction of Civil Court is not ousted. However, Civil Courts have to be extremely cautious while granting any interim order ....
The bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be extended to claims involving collusion and fraud, which are better addressed before the Civil Court.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction to hear suits alleging fraud against secured creditors, despite Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, provided specific allegations are made.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.