A. S. CHANDURKAR, URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Arunkumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The appellant has challenged the order and judgment dtd. 8/10/2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.2122 of 2002 confirming the order passed by the respondent no.1.
3. Brief facts of the case are as follows :
A] In the year 1973 the Firm namely M/s Akot Wine Mart was constituted and licence for wine shop (Country and foreign liquor) was obtained in the name of M/s Akot Wine Mart. On 1/11/1978, the firm was reconstituted and three persons namely Vijaykumar Dwarkalal Jaiswal, Arunkumar Dwarkalal Jaiswal (Appellant) and Dinkarrao Pundlikrao Gawande were the partners of the firm. On 1/9/1992 a fresh deed of partnership was executed and as per Clause 10, on the death of a partner the firm was not to be dissolved. The legal heirs were disentitled from claiming any goodwill or rights of the firm. On 21/11/1994 Dinkarrao, a partner expired. The said partnership was again reconstituted on 23/12/1994 and the remaining two partners agreed to share profits and losses equally.
4. According to the appellant, as per the terms and conditions of the partnership Deed, on the death or retirement of any p
Puran Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab and Ors
State of Punjab and Ors. Vs. Dr. R.N. Bhatnagar
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Mayzur Islam Mallick
Collector of Bombay and Ors. Vs. Meena Narayan Idnani
Shamlal Jaglal Jaiswal Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Khushal Khemgar Shah and Ors. Vs. Mrs. Khorshed Banu Dadiba Boatwalla
Babubhai Muljibhai Patel Vs. Nandlal Khodidas Barot
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.