A. A. SAYED, M. S. KARNIK
Hanumanprasad Rameshwardas – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
M.S.KARNIK,J. - The Petitioners challenge the notices dtd. 6/1/2000 received by the Petitioners from the Tahasildar, Labour Dues Recovery, Mumbai demanding payment of Rs.9,38,153.00 towards dues of workers of Suvidha Warehousing Company (Private) Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") and threatening the attachment and sale of the personal property of the Petitioners for recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue. The Petitioners have also challenged the fnal order dtd. 6/11/1999 under sec. 13 of Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as "the Mathadi Act") and the Recovery Certifcate dtd. 30/12/1999 issued by the Respondent No. 3-Kirana Bazar and Dukane Mandal i.e. Grocery Market & Shop Board (hereinafter referred to as "the Board").
2. The Petitioners were at all material times the Directors of the Company. Under the provisions of the Mathadi Act and the scheme framed thereunder, both the employees and the employers are required to be registered with the Respondent No. 3 - Board. The Company was the registered employer with the Respondent No. 3-Board. For loading and unloading
State of U.P. and Others Vs. Renusagar Power Co. and Others
J. K. Industries Ltd. and Others Vs. Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers
Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. S.K. Aggarwal
Kundan Singh Vs. Moga Transport Co. (P.) Ltd
Pepsico India Holding Private Limited Vs. Grocery Market and Shops Board
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.