PRAKASH D. NAIK
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Ajoy Kumar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The applicant/Union of India/CBI is aggrieved by order dtd. 6/12/2018 passed by Special Judge (CBI) in CBI Special Case No.100 of 2009 allowing application (Exhibit-213), directing CBI to provide documents to respondent no.1.
2. The FIR was registered by CBI vide RC 08(A)/2007-Mum on 22/2/2007 against respondent no.1 u/s.109 of Indian Penal Code read with Sec. 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In the FIR it was alleged that during the period from 16/12/1987 to 31/3/2005 the accusedrespondent no.1 amassed disproportionate assets to the tune of Rs.95,32,424.00 in his name and in the name of his wife and relatives. During the course of investigation it was revealed that accused no.1 being public servant had acquired movable and immovable assets to the tune of Rs.3,07,97,136.00 in his name and in the name of others during the period from 16/12/1987 to 23/2/2007 against his likely savings of Rs.6,64,441.00. The wife of accused no.1 and his relatives aided and abetted accused no.1 in acquiring the assets. On completing investigation charge sheet was filed.
3. Respondent no.1 filed an application before Trial Court u/s.91 of Cr.P.C seeking directions to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.