Back
MANGESH S. PATIL
Kashiram @ Kashinath Sadashiv Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Nhavi Masjid Trust – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This is a second appeal by the original defendants who had successfully defended the suit of the respondent-trust for possession after termination of lease of the suit property pursuant to the provisions of Chapter V of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, but are aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and order passed by the lower appellate court which has quashed and set aside the judgment and the order of the trial court and has decreed the suit.
2. The respondent is a trust duly registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act ('Trusts Act'). It is the owner of the suit property bearing survey no. 490 admeasuring 3 Acre 24 Guntha of village Nhavi, Taluka Yawal, District Jalgaon. The appellants (original defendants) were the tenants in the suit property. The respondent - trust had obtained a certificate from the Collector Jalgaon under section 88B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act ('Tenancy Act') on 20-10-1960. As a result, some of the provisions of the Tenancy Act were not applicable to the suit property. The quit notice dated 28-06-1977 was served to the appellants terminating the tenancy with effect from 21-01-1978 or in the alternative with effect fr
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the certificate under section 88B of the Tenancy Act and the legality of the quit notice under section 106 of the Transfer of Prope....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to interpret and apply the provisions of the Abolition Act and the Tenancy Act, and the requirement for the existence of a su....
The court affirmed that the exemption certificate under Section 88B of the Tenancy Act was valid as the Trust met the necessary criteria, and the Petitioners' claims of tenancy did not negate this.
The amendments under Section 88-E of the Tenancy Act are not retroactive, protecting previously established rights in tenancy disputes, while valid grounds for termination and future mesne profits we....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of the exemption certificate under Section 88C of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, in determining proc....
Exemption under Section 88-B of the Tenancy Act does not divest tenant of rights acquired on the tillers' day, even if a subsequent exemption is granted to the trust.
The court emphasized the need for the Additional Collector to resolve disputed ownership claims under the Tenancy Act, ensuring due process and notice to all parties involved.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
