SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G.S. Kulkarni, J.
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Kunal Structure (india) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – Respondents
Arbitration Petition No. 6 of 2022 with Arbitration Petition No. 10 of 2022 with Arbitration Petition No. 12 of 2022 with Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 21 of 2022
Decided On : 02-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Aseem Naphade A/W. Mr. Nikhil Mehta I/B. Kmc Legal Venture, for the Appellant; Mr. Vishwas Shah A/W. Akshay Shah, Mr. Raj Adhia, for the Respondent.

The Court upheld the petitioner's entitlement to interim reliefs pending arbitral proceedings, dismissed respondent no. 1's objections regarding stamp duty and valuation of mortgaged properties, and referred the disputes to arbitration, based on the terms and conditions of the Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement and relevant legal precedents.

Headnote:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Non-Banking Financial Company - Loan Default - Interim Measures - Order XL, Rule 1 of CPC 1908 - Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement - Receiver Appointment - Possession of Hypothecated Asset - Enforcement of Charge - Arbitration Agreement - Jurisdiction Clause - Repossession Notice - Stamp Duty - Valuation of Mortgaged Properties - Inclination to Arbitration

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a non-banking financial company, granted loans to respondent no. 1 for acquiring construction equipments/vehicles. Respondent no. 1 defaulted on loan repayments, leading to a total amount of about 11 crores being owed to the petitioner. The petitioner sought interim measures pending arbitral proceedings, including the appointment of the Court Receiver to take possession of the hypothecated asset. The respondent opposed the petition, claiming that the petitioner already had a mortgage of immovable property of higher value than the claim and failed to invoke the arbitration agreement or provide necessary documents. The Court ordered respondent no. 1 to hand over the construction equipments/vehicles to the petitioner and appointed the Court Receiver as a receiver if respondent no. 1 failed to comply. The Court also referred the disputes to arbitration by appointing a sole arbitrator.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that respondent no. 1 had defaulted on loan repayments and that the petitioner was entitled to interim reliefs pending arbitral proceedings. The Court also dismissed respondent no. 1's objections regarding stamp duty, valuation of mortgaged properties, and the petitioner's inclination to arbitration.

Issues: Loan default, interim measures, appointment of Court Receiver, possession of hypothecated asset, enforcement of charge, arbitration agreement, stamp duty, valuation of mortgaged properties, inclination to arbitration

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the petitioner was entitled to interim reliefs pending arbitral proceedings, including the appointment of the Court Receiver to take possession of the hypothecated asset, as per the terms and conditions of the Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement. The Court also dismissed respondent no. 1's objections regarding stamp duty, valuation of mortgaged properties, and the petitioner's inclination to arbitration, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents.

Final Decision: The Court ordered respondent no. 1 to hand over the construction equipments/vehicles to the petitioner and appointed the Court Receiver as a receiver if respondent no. 1 failed to comply. The Court also referred the disputes to arbitration by appointing a sole arbitrator.

JUDGMENT

1. These are four petitions filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act') whereby the petitioner, which is a non-banking financial company and which has granted loans to respondent no. 1 for the purpose of acquiring different construction equipments/vehicles, is before the Court praying for interim measures pending the arbitral proceedings.

2. The facts in relation to these petitions are similar. For convenience and as agreed between the parties, the facts in Arbitration Petition no. 6 of 2022 being the lead matter can be referred. The petitioner is involved in the business of providing financial facilities, such as Auto loan, personal loan, business loan, home loan, Asset loan etc. Respondent no. 1-company is incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its place of business at Ahmedabad, as set out in the cause title. Respondent no. 1 as a borrower approached the petitioner for availing a loan facility. The financial requirement as applied by respondent no. 1 was for an amount of Rs.49,00,990/- for acquiring construction equipments/vehicles (for short 'the equpments) namely, HAMM GRW-15 WH ROLLER make WRITGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED bearing Engine No. 12240694 and Chassis No. WGH0H190KHAA03128. The petitioner agreed to finance such requirement of respondent no. 1. Accordingly, a Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement dated 31 May, 2019 (for short 'the LHA') came to be entered between the parties. The loan amount was disbursed. As a consequence of the LHA the said asset stands hypothecated in favour of the petitioner. The agreed rate of interest for such loan was 9.50% p.a. and the repayment schedule was of 48 monthly instalments of Rs.1,25,345/-.

3. The case of the petitioner was that there was default by respondent no. 1 in repayment of the loan installments. This is a common factor in all these petitions. The total amount disbursed and subject matter of all these four petitions is about 21 crores. The petitioner has contended that an amount of about 11 crores is now required to be recovered from respondent no. 1 as also from the guarantors.

4. The petitioner by its letter dated 9 September, 2021 addressed its advocate to respondent no. 1 informed respondent no. 1 of the defaults in repayment of loan. Respondent no. 1 was also put to a notice that in the event the amounts in default are not being not paid, the loan would stand recalled. As respondent no. 1 failed to regularize the loan amounts and the amounts being substantial, the petitioner has approached the Court in the present proceedings praying for interim measures pending the arbitral proceedings. The petitioner has pressed for a relief that the Court Receiver, High Court be appointed as receiver to take possession of the equipment in question, which is also a relief in terms of what has been agreed between the parties under the LHA The petitioner has prayed for the following relief:

    ''a. The Court Receiver High Court Bombay be appointed as Receiver and take peaceful physical possession under Order XL, Rule 1 of CPC 1908 in respect of the hypothecated asset being HAMM GRW-15 WH ROLLER make WRITGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Engine No: 12240694 and Chassis No: WGH0H190KHAA0318 whether in the possession of the Respondents and/or any 3rd party and this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents and/or any 3rd Party (who may be in possession of the hypothecated Asset) to hand over the physical, peaceful and vacant possession of the HAMM GRW-15 WH ROLLER make WRITGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Engine No; 12240694 and Chassis No: WGH0H190KHAA03128 forthwith accordingly to the Court Receiver. If the Court Receiver is not allowed the physical, peaceful and vacant possession of the hypothecated asset being HAMM GRW-15 WH ROLLER make WRITGEN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Engine No: 12240694 and Chassis No: WGH0H190KHAA03128 by the Respondents, the Court Receiver be allowed to take forcible possession of the said hypothecated Asset in the

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top