Back
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
Dnyaneshwar Balasaheb Sonawane – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. By this petition, the petitioners have put forth their prayers at clause 23 (b) to (e) as under :-
"(b) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ thereby holding that, the petitioners are recruited prior to 1/11/2005 and therefore, they are entitled to get the benefits of old pension scheme i.e. The Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules 1982 and Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 and General Provident Fund Scheme (GPF.) and for that purpose issue necessary orders;
(c) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other writ, order or directions in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the Respondent Authorities to extend the benefits to the Petitioners under The Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules 1982 and Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 and General Provident Fund Scheme (GPF.) and further direct them to make contribution towards the said Pension Scheme and General Provident Fund Scheme;
(d) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the like nature, thereby directing the Respondent authorities not to enf
The timing and completion of the recruitment process are crucial in determining entitlement to specific pension schemes and benefits.
Service matter - Pension - Applicability of Government Resolution - The Government servants whose appointment were issued prior to 31st October, 2005 would be governed by the old pension scheme.
The delay in the appointment process did not entitle the petitioners to the benefits of the old pension scheme, and the 1969 Circular was not binding to support their claim.
Employment recruitment delays not attributable to candidates can exempt them from new pension rules, allowing adherence to older pension systems.
Coverage under Old Pension Scheme is determined by appointment date, not recruitment process commencement; arbitrary denial underlay by legal precedent is unsupported.
The date of initiation of the recruitment process is crucial in determining the coverage of pension schemes for employees, as emphasized by relevant case laws and applied in this judgment.
Delays in appointing candidates due to state inaction invalidate their placement under the new pension scheme, permitting claims to the old scheme benefits.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the right to be governed by a pension scheme is determined by the date of commencement of the recruitment process, and delay in appointment du....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
