SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Satya Dev Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
Delhi High Court – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

1. The petitioners have filed these petitions, inter alia, impugning an Office Memorandum dated 17.02.2020 (hereafter referred to as `the impugned OM'), whereby the coverage under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 (hereafter `the Old Pension Scheme') was confined to only those candidates who were recruited against vacancies arising on or before 31.12.2003 and the selection results were declared on or before 01.01.2004. All other employees appointed after the cut-off date, including the petitioners, are not covered under the Old Pension Scheme but would participate in the National Pension Scheme (hereafter referred to as `NPS'), which is a contributory scheme.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved as they have been denied the benefit of being covered under the Old Pension Scheme. The petitioners had made their representations to the Establishment of this Court (hereafter `the DHC') which were rejected on the recommendations of the concerned Committee of the DHC. The petitioners have, therefore, impugned the order rejecting their representations as well.

3. The petitioners claim that since their applications for employment with the DHC were submitted pursuant t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top