PRASANNA B. VARALE, S. M. MODAK
Sunil Bhima Kurhade – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.M.MODAK, J. - Short issue involved in this petition is whether the Petitioner is entitled to the benefit of concurrent sentence as laid down in the provisions of sec. 427 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He was convicted firstly for the offence punishable under sec. 302. 341 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code on 30/8/2012. When he was undergoing this sentence, he was convicted on 12/2/2014 for the offence punishable under sec. 324 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the learned Magistrate who convicted him in subsequent trial was aware that the petitioner is in jail but still he has not given the benefit of sec. 427(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. There is subsequent development. The Petitioner was acquitted by this Court vide Order dtd. 9/8/2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 1131/2012 and 229/2019. The Petitioner has brought this fact to the notice of learned Magistrate on 23/8/2021. He called a report from jail authorities. Instead of giving the benefit of concurrent sentence, the learned Magistrate has left the issue with the jail authorities by observing that if the Petitioner has undergone sentence of 2 years 6 months ( and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.