IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Manish Pitale, J.
Arun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Police Inspector, Colva – Respondent
Criminal Application Bail No. 108 of 2022-F
Decided On : 23-02-2022
Bail - Criminal Offenses - The court granted bail to the applicants based on the principle of parity with a previously granted bail to another accused in the same case. The court considered the seriousness of the offenses, lack of victim witnesses, completion of investigation, and absence of criminal antecedents of the applicants in reaching its decision.
Fact of the Case:
The applicants sought bail in connection with a case involving offenses under Sec. 370 of the IPC and Ss. 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. One of the accused had already been granted bail by the court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the role attributed to the applicants was not materially different from the previously granted bail accused, and therefore, granted bail to the applicants with specific conditions.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicants should be granted bail considering the seriousness of the offenses and the previous grant of bail to another accused in the same case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the principle of parity, lack of victim witnesses, completion of investigation, and absence of criminal antecedents of the applicants in granting bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail applications with specific conditions imposed on the applicants.
JUDGMENT
1. These two applicants before this Court are seeking bail in connection with FIR No.77 of 2021 dtd. 16/10/2021, registered at the Colva Police Station, South Goa for offences under Sec. 370 of the IPC and Ss. 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.
2. It is an admitted position that there are three accused persons in this case and accused no.2 was granted bail by this Court on 9/2/2022.
3. Although these applications are listed for the first time before this Court, since an advanced copy was served on the office of learned Advocate General, the learned Public Prosecutor has appeared in these cases and say has been filed in these applications.
4. Mr. R. Desai, learned Counsel appearing for the applicants has placed reliance on the order dtd. 9/2/2022 passed by this Court granting bail to accused no.2(Criminal Misc. Application (Bail) No.43 of 2022-F- Satwat Singh Vs The Police Inspector Officer Incharge of Colva Police Station and anr.). The learned Counsel seeks parity and submits that the applicants undertake to abide by the conditions that this Court may impose while granting bail. It is further submitted that the aforesaid order of this Court was brought to the notice of the Sessions Court while seeking bail for the applicants, but the Sessions Court chose to reject the bail applications.
5. Mr. S. G. Bhobe, learned Public Prosecutor, submitted that accused no. 2, in this case, was indeed granted bail by order dtd. 9/2/2022. It was submitted that the aspect of parity was also argued before the Sessions Court. In fact, it was brought to the notice of the Sessions Court that the accused no. 2 was released on bail by this Court and the same was noted in the orders passed by the Sessions Court in the case of applicants herein.
6. Considering the fact that the role attributed to the applicants before this Court is not materially different from the role that was attributed to the accused no.2, who has been enlarged on bail by this Court by order dtd. 9/2/2022, this Court is of the opinion that present applications can be allowed by imposing appropriate conditions.
7. It is a matter of record that although the offences registered against the applicants are serious in nature, it is found that in the list of witnesses, none of the victim girls have been shown as witnesses proposed to be examined by the prosecution. The investigation is admittedly complete and the chargesheet was filed on 16/11/2021. It was also stated that the applicants do not have a criminal antecedents. Therefore, these applications deserve to be allowed.
8. In view of the above, the applications are allowed in the following terms:
(a) The applicants shall be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.50,000.00 each with one cash surety each in the like amount to be deposited before the Trial Court, in connection with FIR No.77/2021 dtd. 16/10/2021, registered at Colva Police Station.
(b) The applicants shall attend the proceedings before the Trial Court on each and every date.
(c) The applicants shall place on the record of the Trial Court their contact numbers including their mobile numbers and their addresses where they would be residing.
(d) The applicants shall keep the Trial Court informed of any change of the address or contact number during the pendency of the trial.
(e) The applicants shall place on the record of the Trial Court the details of the Police Stations within the jurisdiction of which they shall be residing at their native places.
(f ) The applicants shall not themselves or through any other person act in any manner that would amount to tampering with the evidence or influencing witnesses.
(g) Needless to say, that violation of any of the aforesaid conditions shall make the applicants liable for cancellation of bail.
(h) It is made clear that the Trial Court shall proceed with the matter, uninfluenced by the observations made in the present order.
The principle of parity and consideration of the seriousness of offenses, lack of victim witnesses, completion of investigation, and absence of criminal antecedents influenced the court's decision in....
The court may grant pre-arrest bail when the investigation is substantially complete, the accused is not named in the First Information Report, or the grievances between the parties have been settled....
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.
The principle of parity in bail applications allows for similar treatment of accused individuals in comparable circumstances, provided that appropriate safeguards are in place to protect the integrit....
The court emphasized the importance of considering the facts of the case after the filing of the charge-sheet before granting bail and highlighted the impact of the cancellation of a previous bail or....
The court established that prolonged detention without trial, alongside the nature of the injuries and the status of co-accused, can justify the granting of bail, reinforcing the presumption of innoc....
The court considered the duration of the applicant's incarceration, her local status, and willingness to offer sureties before granting bail with certain terms and conditions.
Bail can be granted when witnesses turn hostile and cannot identify the accused, especially when the trial is expected to be lengthy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.