State Of Goa VS Mahesh Tanna

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

MANISH PITALE
State Of Goa – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Tanna – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
S.G. Bhobe, Public Prosecutor, for the Appellant; Arun Bras De Sa and Sahil Sardessai, Advocates, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Manish Pitale, J. - Heard Mr. S.G. Bhobe, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the Applicant--State.

2. This is an application challenging an order dated 18.01.2022 passed by the Court of Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, FTC at Mapusa, in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 8 of 2022.

3. Mr. Arun Bras De Sa, learned Counsel, on instructions, has appeared on behalf of the Respondent(Accused).

4. The Applicant-State is aggrieved by the manner in which the aforesaid Court has passed the Order dated 18.01.2022, granting ad-interim bail to the Respondent on certain conditions. According to the learned Public Prosecutor, the manner in which the order is passed is in the teeth of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which was recently reiterated by this Court.

5. Attention of this Court is invited to contents of the application for anticipatory bail filed on behalf of the Respondent, stating that there is no reference to the version of the Respondent as regards the incident in question and that it is found on investigation by the concerned Officer that the statement regarding the Respondent being an Indian National, is false and that the address of the State of Goa given in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document