Shivek Ramesh Dhar VS State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SARANG V. KOTWAL
Shivek Ramesh Dhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Resham I. Sahni, Advocate, for the Appellant; Smt.A.A. Takalkar, App, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R.No.495/2021 registered with Rabale Police Station, Navi Mumbai, dated 02/12/2021, under sections 498-A, 323, 504, 406, 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3 an 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. Heard Resham I. Sahni, learned counsel for the Applicant and Smt. A.A. Takalkar, learned APP for the State.

3. The FIR is lodged by the Applicant's wife on 02/12/2021. She has stated that she got married with the Applicant on 11/11/2017. At the time of marriage, the Applicant's family wanted gold coin each for their family members. But the informant and her family refused to give those. After the marriage the in-laws used to talk about their demand and used to cause harassment to the informant. It is mentioned that her sister-in-law and the father-in-law used to instigate the Applicant and thereafter the Applicant used to insult and humiliate the informant. He used to abuse her. The couple has a son, who is 3 years of age as of today. In November 2019, the Applicant and the informant started residing in Vashi, Navi Mumbai. It is her case that the informant had given around Rs.13,50,000/- for purchasing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document