2023 Supreme(Bom) 787
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
R. G. Avachat, R. G. Avachat, JJ.
Syed Sarfaraz – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 651, 653, 717 of 2014, 238 of 2015
Decided On : 23-03-2023
Advocates appeared:
H. D. Deshmukh, Advocate, N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate, G. R. Syed, Advocate, P. G. Borade, Advocate
Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 302, 120-B, 143, 147, 148, and 149 - Indian Arms Act - Section 3 read with Section 25 - Conviction for murder and conspiracy upheld - Trial Court's findings based on testimonies were reliable and consistent; prior rivalry established motive for murder - Accused Number 6 acquitted due to insufficient evidence connecting him to the crime. (Paras 1, 3, 42, 44)
(B) Testimony of relatives admissible - Their relationship with the victim does not automatically imply bias; the court must evaluate every witness's credibility and motive. (Paras 6, 20)
Facts of the case:
The murder of the victim occurred following a premeditated conspiracy involving the accused who previously had a political rivalry with him. The attack was executed in broad daylight, witnessed by many, and resulted in the victim's immediate death. The investigation led to the recovery of firearms and the identification of the assailants by eyewitnesses. (Paras 2, 4, 14)
Findings of Court:
The court confirmed the conviction based on credible eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, and established a clear motive. Testimonies about the conspiracy were deemed reliable. The conviction against accused Number 6 was overturned due to a lack of substantial evidence. (Paras 43, 45)
Issues: Whether the prosecution proved the conspiracy and murder beyond a reasonable doubt, and whether the testimonies of the relatives were sufficient to maintain conviction. (Paras 1, 41)
Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld that conspiracies may be inferred from circumstantial evidence and that the identification of accused in court stands as a substantive piece of evidence, regardless of procedural irregularities during the identification parade. (Paras 22, 26)
Result: Criminal Appeal Nos. 651 of 2014, 238 of 2015, and 717 of 2014 dismissed; Criminal Appeal No. 653 of 2014 allowed, and conviction of accused No. 6 set aside.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding witness credibility. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. evaluations of witness testimonies. (Para 6 , 19 , 23 , 24 , 28) |
| 4. proof of conspiracy and individual liability. (Para 26 , 38 , 45) |
| 5. final verdict and orders. (Para 43) |
JUDGMENT
R. M. Joshi, J. - Appellants/accused being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed in Sessions Case No. 376 of 2011 convicting them for the offences punishable under Sections 3 02, 120-B, 143, 147, 148 read with Section 149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short 'IPC) and 3 read with 25 of Indian ARMS ACT and sentencing them to suffer imprisonment for life with fine have preferred these appeals under Section 3 74 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr.P.C.).
2. In nutshell the story of the prosecution can be recorded as under:
(a) On 18/05/2011 Anna Lashkare, resident of Newasa along with his wife (Pooja), three children and neighbouring boy (Manoj) came to Aurangabad in his own car. When they reached near Nagar Naka one car gave dash to the vehicle of Lashkare. Both vehicles halted at about 100-150 meters from the place of the said accident. Both drivers were engaged into altercation over the said issue. At the said place two motorcycles came and 4-5 persons alighted there from. Two of them caught hold of Lashkare and others fired bullets on him from close range. Lashkare fell down in injured condition. His wife Pooja had sought help from the bypassers and after some time one unknown person drove them in car of Lashkare to Ghati Hospital. Lashkare was declared dead by Doctor on being brought to the hospital. Pooja lodged the report in respect of the said incident at about 9.15 pm and pursuant to the said First Information Report bearing No. I-130/2011 came to be registered at Chhavni Police Station, (b) The Investigation into the said crime commenced and panchnama of spot as shown by Pooja was drawn. From the said spot empty cartridges were seized. A mobile phone of the assailants came into the hands of Pooja while she tried to catch hold of him was seized by drawing panchnama. According to the investigating agency the said mobile phone was found to be of Munna Jahagirdar. Thereafter in the said direction investigation was carried out. Investigating Officer got secret information about the assailants having gone to Indore and hence he along with panch witnesses went to Indore and accosted Munna and Javed. During the interrogation it was revealed that the weapons of assaults were concealed in the residential house of Sayyed Sarfaraj at Ahmedangar. The Investigating Officer therefore went to the house of Sarfaraj and in presence of panch witnesses two fire arms were seized under the panchnama (Exhibit 166). Motorcycle used in committing offence was also seized from his residence (Panchnama Exhibit 166). Further investigation was carried out and it was revealed to the Investigating Agency that the murder of Lashkare was an out come of a conspiracy hatched by Raju Jahagirdar accused No.1 with co-accused. In that direction investigation was done and statements of witnesses were recorded who had claimed to have heard the conversation between the accused persons giving an impression to them about there was a conspiracy to kill Lashkare. Statement of the witnesses were also recorded indicating that in the evening of the faithful day accused Munna and Javed had altercation with Lashkare at petrol pump at Khadka phata and they followed deceased's vehicle on Pulsar motorcycle. During the course of investigation four accused persons were put to identification parade and eye witnesses. Pooja and Manoj identified accused Nos. 2 to 4 to be the assailants involved in the actual assault. Investigating Officer has recovered Nano motorcar which was allegedly used in the said incident by which accident was caused and deceased was kept engaged at the spot. Seized fire arms were sent for ballistic examination and the report of the ballistic
Click Here to Read the rest of this document