A. S. CHANDURKAR, M. W. CHANDWANI
Sine Fine Advertising Pvt. Limited – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Brihan Mumbai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A. S. Chandurkar, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the show cause notice dated 11/01/2023 issued by respondent No.2-Deputy Municipal Commissioner of the respondent No.1-Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai principally on the ground that the said show-cause notice has been issued in a premeditated manner as it conveys the decision already taken by the respondent No.2-Deputy Municipal Commissioner without leaving anything for the petitioner No.1-Company to show cause.
2. The facts that are not in dispute are that initially on 24/06/1981 the Municipal Corporation granted no-objection to the display of two hoardings to M/s We Two Advertisers. The Company claims to have purchased the rights in that regard and on payment of monthly license fee to the Municipal Corporation, it has been operating the said hoardings since then. By virtue of having paid the hoarding fees till 31/03/2023, the company is entitled to have the said hoardings in place at least till that date. On 11/01/2023, the respondent No.2 issued a show-cause notice to the Company in which it was stated that on 14/
H. L. Trehan and ors. vs. Union of India and ors. (1989) 1 SCC 764
K. I. Shephard vs. Union of India (1987) 4 SCC 431)
Shekhar Ghosh vs. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 331 and Rajesh Kumar vs. D.C.I.T. (2007) 2 SCC 181
Siemens Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. (2006) 12 SCC 33
Special Director vs. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse (2004) 3 SCC 440
Union of India vs. Kunisetty Satyanarayana (2006) 12 SCC 28
V. C. Banaras Hindu University vs. Shrikant (2006) 11 SCC 42
A show-cause notice issued with premeditation, indicating the Authority's decision, fails to comply with the principles of natural justice.
The court emphasized the importance of detailed reasons in a show-cause notice and upheld the jurisdiction of the authorities to exercise powers under the Act.
Illegal construction on government land without ownership or permission does not entitle the petitioners to challenge the Corporation's action. The Corporation's offer of alternative accommodation ma....
Section 210 (1) (a) empowers the Commissioner to prescribe a street line for the first time without the prior approval of the Standing Committee (as has been done in the present case). It is only und....
The court upheld the legality of tender issuance for advertising rights under 2017 regulations concerning roadside hoardings.
Delay in adjudication of show cause notices is a violation of principles of natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.