SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1098

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Prakash D.Naik, J.
Nagesh Rajshekhar Mense – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 799, 1648, 522, 2259, 2379, 629, 531, 781, 782, 461, 156, 511, 189, 193, 419, 2620, 667, 314, 1833, 2112, 892, 2519, 2518, 483, 532, 226, 321, 2931 of 2022 & 2913, 2866, 2993, 2590, 3023, 2595, 2761, 2737 of 2021
Decided On : 03-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Raja Thakare, Advocate, Gopal N.Parab, Advocate, A.A.Palkar, Advocate, Mahendra N.Sandhyanshiv, Advocate, Rupesh A.Zade, Advocate, Veerdhval Kakade, Advocate, Aniket Nikam, Advocate, Amit Icham, Advocate, Vivek Arote, Advocate, Abhishek Kulkarni, Advocate, V.V.Gangurde, Advocate, Rui Danawala, Advocate, Umesh R.Mankapure, Advocate, Ritesh Thobde, Advocate, Priyal G.Sards, Advocate, Prashant S.Hagare, Advocate, Kuldeep S.Patil, Advocate, Saili N.Dhuru, Advocate, Imran Shaikh, Advocate, N.B.Patil, Advocate, V.V.Purwant, Advocate, Tushar Sonawane, Advocate, Rajaram V.Bansode, Advocate, Vimal Kumar Patwa, Advocate, Pranav Pokhale, Advocate, Tanmay Karwa, Advocate, P.N.Dabholkar, Advocate, Rahul B.Vijaymane, Advocate, Kushal Mor, Advocate, Kunal Bilanay, Advocate, Sana Raees Khan, Advocate, Aditya Parmar, Advocate, Shreyas P.Baraswade, Advocate

Section 328 IPC is applicable in cases involving the possession, transportation, and sale of banned substances under the FSS Act.

Headnote:

The Court examined the applicability of Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in cases involving the possession, transportation, and sale of banned substances, particularly Gutkha and Pan Masala, under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSS Act). The Court analyzed various judgments, including Joseph Kurian Philip Jose v. State of Kerala, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia v. State of Maharashtra, Ganesh Pandurang Jadhao v. State of Maharashtra, and others, to determine the scope and interpretation of Section 328 IPC in such cases.

Fact of the Case:

Numerous applications were filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) seeking anticipatory bail in connection with First Information Reports (FIRs) registered for offenses under Sections 26(2)(iv), 27(3)(d), 27(3)(c), 30(2)(a), and 59 of the FSS Act, as well as Sections 188, 272, 273, and 328 of the IPC.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that Section 328 IPC is applicable in cases involving the possession, transportation, and sale of banned substances under the FSS Act. The Court reasoned that the language of Section 328 IPC is broad enough to encompass such cases, and that the harmful effects of these substances on human health are well-established. The Court also noted that the Legislature has specifically prohibited the manufacture, possession, and sale of these substances, indicating its intent to protect public health.

Issues: The main issue before the Court was whether Section 328 IPC is applicable in cases involving the possession, transportation, and sale of banned substances under the FSS Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was based on the following reasoning: * Section 328 IPC is broadly worded and encompasses cases involving the possession, transportation, and sale of banned substances under the FSS Act. * The harmful effects of these substances on human health are well-established. * The Legislature has specifically prohibited the manufacture, possession, and sale of these substances, indicating its intent to protect public health.

Final Decision: The Court rejected all the anticipatory bail applications, holding that the applicants were not entitled to relief under Section 438 of CrPC. The Court also extended the interim protection granted to the applicants by a period of four weeks to enable them to approach the appropriate forum for relief.

JUDGMENT

PRAKASH D.NAIK,J. - These applications are preferred under Sec. 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "Cr.P.C.") seeking anticipatory bail in connection with First Information Reports (for short "FIR") for the offences under Ss. 26(2)(iv), 27(3)(d), 27(3)(c), 30(2)(a) and Ss. 3, 59 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (for short "FSS Act") and Ss. 188, 272, 273, 328 Indian Penal Code (for short "IPC").

2. Since common issues are involved in all these applications, they were heard together and disposed off by common order.

3. The common grounds urged in these applications seeking anticipatory bail are as follows :

i) Except Sec. 328 of IPC all the other offences are bailable in nature.

ii) The offence under Sec. 328 of IPC is not attracted and applicable in the present cases.

iii) Custodial interrogation of the applicants is not necessary.

4. Learned Advocate in ABA No. 799 OF 2022 submitted that, the applicant is apprehending arrest in C.R. No. 579 of 2021 registered with Jodbhavi Police Station for offences under Ss. 188, 272, 273, 328 of IPC and Sec. 59 of FSS Act. It is submitted that, the applicant was not found in possession of any article. Co-accused has been arrested and granted bail. The applicant is arrested on the basis of statement of co-accused. The applicant was named in the remand application for the first time. Sec. 328 of IPC is not applicable. The co-accused was arrested and granted bail. Reliance is placed on the order dtd. 11/8/2021 passed by this Court in ABA No.1756 of 2021 and ABA No.1757 of 2021, wherein pre-arrest bail was granted to the applicants therein on the ground that their custodial interrogation is not necessary.

Learned APP submitted that the offence is of serious nature. The involvement of the applicant was disclosed during interrogation of co-accused. Sec. 328 of IPC is attracted. The applicant is absconding. Custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary. Investigation is in progress. Co-accused were found in possession of banned Gutkha and other materials. During inquiry with the arrested accused it was revealed that the applicant and others had provided banned Gutkha and other material for selling the material to public at large. Learned APP Mr. Palkar relied upon the decision of this Court dtd. 23/12/2021 passed in ABA No.1405 of 2021 and other group of matters.

5. Learned Advocate appearing for applicant in ABA No.2913 of 2021 submitted that, the applicant is apprehending arrest in C.R. No.378 of 2021 registered with Manmad City Police Station, Manmad for offences under Sec. 179, 188, 272, 273 and 328 of IPC as well as Sec. 26(2)(i), 26(2)(iv), 59 and 27(2)(e) of FSS Act. It is submitted that the FIR in this case was registered on 10/11/2021. Although the raid was conducted on 8/10/2021, there is delay in lodging FIR. False complaint is lodged against the applicant. Custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary. Sec. 328 of IPC is not attracted. Investigation is completed.

Learned APP submitted that, no ground is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. The delay has been explained in the FIR. The applicant was arrested for offence under Sec. 326 of IPC. The effect of delay can be considered during trial. There are specific allegations against the applicant that the he has stored contraband articles i.e. Rajniwas Panmasala packets flavoured Tobacco mix and various other packets. The purpose of storing of contraband articles in the grocery shop is for sale. Therefore articles are hazardous to consume. Custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary. Sec. 328 of IPC is attracted. The issue is already dealt with by this Court.

6. Learned Advocate in ABA No.1648 of 2022 submitted that, the applicant is apprehending arrest in C.R. No.285 of 2022 for offences under Ss. 328, 188, 272, 273 of IPC and Ss. 26(2)(iv), 27, 30(2), 31 and 59 of FSS Act. It is submitted that, except Sec. 328 of IPC all the other offences are bailable in nature. Sec. 328 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top