RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses B and C as under :-
C. By a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, application filed by the Petitioner under Section 28-A under Land Acquisition Act may kindly be allowed."
3. The Petitioner has contended that she is the owner and possessor of land Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9, admeasuring 11 R situated at village Sakol, Tal.Shirur Anantpal, Dist.Latur. The said land was acquired for the Sakol Medium Project on 09.12.1996. A notification u/s 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was published on 26.06.1999. The award came to be delivered on 21.12.2001 quantifying the compensation amount of Rs. 610 Per R for the acquired land. The Petitioner has not filed a reference petition u/s 18. Other co-claimants filed LAR No.115/2006 and by judgment dated 30.01.2
Rohitas Kumar & Ors. v. Om Prakash Sharma & Ors.
Bir Wati and others Vs. Union of India and others, 2017(16) SCC 548
Jose Antonio Cruz Dox Vs. L.A.O. [AIR 1997 SC 1915]
Union of India and Others vs. Mangatu Ram and Others reported in (1997) 6 SCC 59
Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer & Anr.
State of Andhra Pradesh and Another Vs. Marri Venkaiah and others [AIR 2003 SC 2949]
Tota Ram Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others [(1997) 6 SCC 280]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.