Back
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Shaikh Afreen Nooruddin – Appellant
Versus
Admission Regulatory Authority through its Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. The Petitioner earlier had put forth prayer clauses B, C and D as under:-
C. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or any other Appropriate Writ, Order Or Direction in the nature of Mandamus, thereby directing the Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 to forthwith issue Hall Ticket to the Petitioner, thereby allowing her to appear for the MDS Part One - Periodontology Examinations scheduled on 21-09-2021 and subsequently declare the Results of the Petitioner thereof.
D. This Hon. Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate Writ Order Or Direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the Records leading to the issuance of the Impugned Letter dated 05-01-2021 issued by the
The restriction imposed by the 2016 Rules on the right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) is reasonable and thus saved by clause (6) of Article 19.
Admissions to BDS courses granted under relaxed percentile criteria by the State were illegal, emphasizing that only the Central Government holds the authority to set qualifying standards for NEET.
Point of Law; Prescribing a minimum percentile for admission to the Under Graduate Courses for the year 2019-2020 was vehemently defended by the Central Council and the Union of India by submitting t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
