Back
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Sunita Kumari, D/o. Shri Pancha Ram – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan University Of Health And Science, Through Its Registrar – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in Harsh Raj Verma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.911/2018 and other connected matters, on 04.05.2023, which reads as follows:
6. This Court observes that the NEET has been introduced in the country in the year 2016, as an entrance examination for admission in the MBBS/BDS Courses; the whole purpose of the NEET is to enhance and maintain the high standards, in uniformity, in the field of medical. The exercise of conducting the NEET has been uphold by the Constitutional Bench of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Modern Dental Medical College & Research Center & Ors., Vs State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., (2016) 7 SCC 353. The same principle has been reiterated with approval by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Abdul Ahad And Ors. Vs. Union of India (2020) 1 SCC OnLine SC 627 and also, by the Division Bench of the H
Admissions to BDS courses granted under relaxed percentile criteria by the State were illegal, emphasizing that only the Central Government holds the authority to set qualifying standards for NEET.
(1) Judicial review of administrative action is permissible on grounds of illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety – An administrative decision is flawed if it is illegal.(2) If reducing ....
Merely because interim orders have been passed which were adinterim exparte orders without the benefit of the arguments of the other side on the basis of the replies filed and the pleadings, such int....
: If the criteria for minimum percentile is further reduced, this Court is doubtful about the standard of the students taking admission and is wary of their potential to undertake the professional co....
Discretion under regulations for educational admissions must be exercised considering only pertinent factors, and the Union's refusal to further lower NEET percentile requirements was lawful given th....
The discretion vested by Regulation 2(d) is applicable in a situation where there are insufficient candidates in the respective categories who have scored the minimum marks in the NEET. Interference ....
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
