Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited vs Union of India, Through General Manager

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Bom) 38

A. S. CHANDURKAR, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA
Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Through General Manager – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Vineet B. Naik, Sr. Adv. a/w. Adv. Amod Eklaspur, Adv. Ayaz Bilawala and Adv. Yogesh A. Gaikwad i/b. M/s. Bilawala & Co.
For the Respondents: Adv. R.P. Ojha with Adv. Ankit Ojha, Adv. Kirti Ojha and Adv. Rakesh Dubey.

Table of Content
1. request for writs on land redevelopment (Para 1 , 2)
2. historical background of the land lease (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. building condition and redevelopment plans (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. timeline of noc application rejections (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
5. court’s reasoning on noc denial (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
6. interpretation of lease terms (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
7. legal principles on ownership and lease (Para 37 , 38 , 39)
8. defending the noc's necessity and reasonableness (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
9. writ petition considerations against contractual disputes (Para 53 , 54)
10. final orders and directives (Para 58)

JUDGEMENT

(Firdosh P. Pooniwalla J.) :-

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. The present Petition seeks the following final reliefs:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Bom) 38

A. S. CHANDURKAR, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLABhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited – AppellantVersusUnion of India, Through General Manager – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

A. S. CHANDURKAR, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA
Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Through General Manager – Respondent