SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 768

SANJAY DWIVEDI
NARMADA GINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY, HARDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed under article 226 (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background on the lease of land (Para 3)
3. arguments from petitioner and respondents (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. legal questions framed for consideration (Para 13 , 14)
5. summary of arguments from both sides (Para 15 , 16)
6. court's observations and decision (Para 36 , 37)
7. final directions from the court (Para 38)

ORDER : – This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 16-3-2020 (Annexure-P/10) passed by respondent No. 3 whereby the petitioner has been asked to return back the land to respondent No. 3 which was allotted to the petitioner on lease for a period of 30 years i.e. from 1-4-1989 to 31-3-2019.

2. By urging multifarious grounds assailing the action of the respondents, the petitioner has sought following reliefs : –

    “(i) That, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for the entire record leading to issuance of the impugned communication/letter dated 16-3-2020 (Annexure-P/10) from the Respondent No. 3. (ii) That, this Hon’ble Cou


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top