SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 768

SANJAY DWIVEDI
NARMADA GINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY, HARDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER : – This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 16-3-2020 (Annexure-P/10) passed by respondent No. 3 whereby the petitioner has been asked to return back the land to respondent No. 3 which was allotted to the petitioner on lease for a period of 30 years i.e. from 1-4-1989 to 31-3-2019.

2. By urging multifarious grounds assailing the action of the respondents, the petitioner has sought following reliefs : –

    “(i) That, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for the entire record leading to issuance of the impugned communication/letter dated 16-3-2020 (Annexure-P/10) from the Respondent No. 3. (ii) That, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to set aside the impugned communication/letter dated 16-3-2020, passed by the Respondent No. 3, contained in Annexure-P/10. (iii) That, this Hon’ble Court be further pleased to direct the respondents to decide the petitioner’s application (Annexure-P/8) for conversion of land in question from lease hold into free hold within the specified time frame. (iii-a) The impugned orders dated 12-5-2020


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top