K. M. Realty vs Diamond Hill Co-Operative Housing Society Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Bom) 58

SANDEEP V. MARNE
K. M. Realty – Appellant
Versus
Diamond Hill Co-Operative Housing Society Limited – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Simil Purohit, Rubin Vakil, Malik Vora, Pramodkumar.
For the Respondents: Gauraj Shah, Anish Mishra, Vishwanath Mishra, Sanjeet Shukla.

Table of Content
1. entitlement of developer to construct additional building. (Para 1)
2. factual background regarding the development agreement and approvals. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. submissions regarding the necessity of purchaser consent for additional construction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's observations on the city civil court's injunction. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. discussion of legal framework regarding mofa and disclosure obligations. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
6. analysis of construction under dcr and disclosures to flat purchasers. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
7. implications of earlier agreements on developer's obligations. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
8. role of regulatory changes in case assessment. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
9. conclusion that developer's claims must align with original disclosures. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
10. court's strengthening of flat purchaser rights and developer disclosure. (Para 38 , 39 , 40)
11. final conclusion regarding the dismissal of the appeal. (Para 41 , 42)

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

1. The issue involved in the present A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Bom) 58

SANDEEP V. MARNEK. M. Realty – AppellantVersusDiamond Hill Co-Operative Housing Society Limited – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

SANDEEP V. MARNE
K. M. Realty – Appellant
Versus
Diamond Hill Co-Operative Housing Society Limited – Respondent