ABHAY AHUJA
Shree Raj Shrushti Residency Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Romesh Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The Petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order of the Appellate Court dated 30th March, 2022, passed in Appeal No. 23 of 2022 in Exhibit No. 279 in RAE & R Suit No. 54/176 of 1994 before the Small Causes Court, Bandra, (the “said suit”) allowing the Appeal of the original Defendant No.2.
2. The Petitioner as the original Plaintiff has earlier filed the said suit for eviction against the Respondents/Original Defendants in respect of suit premises being sub plot no. 3 of Plot No. A-2, CS No. 164/2 of Vile Parle Division along with shack and structure at Gandhigram Road, Juhu, Mumbai-400 049 (the “said premises/suit premises/ the said property”), admeasuring about 438.70 sq. meters, on the grounds of illegal subletting, arrears of rent and bona fide requirement.
3. The suit was resisted by the Respondents/Original Defendants by filing their written statement and additional written statement. The suit was taken up for evidence. The Petitioner filed their affidavit of evidence along with documents. The documents were, according to the Petitioner, marked by the Trial Court and kept for cross-examination of PW
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretionary nature of the power conferred by Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing the requirement of intentional and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the interpretation of a status quo order must be understood in the context in which it was passed, and any violation must be willful, delibera....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the interpretation of a status-quo order must be seen in the context in which it was passed, and any violation must be willful, deliberate, or....
The proceedings under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC are quasi-criminal in nature, and willful disobedience must be proved beyond a shadow of doubt.
The appellate court has the discretion to admit additional evidence if it is necessary for pronouncing judgment, and failure to consider such evidence can lead to a miscarriage of justice.
The court affirmed that mere interest in property does not grant standing to object in execution proceedings if title has been conclusively determined.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in determining the necessity of adding parties to the su....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a decree obtained by a tenant against a licensee can be executable against subsequent purchasers who are in possession without any lawful decr....
The court reinforced that obstruction claims in execution proceedings must be heard to uphold rights, ensuring adherence to natural justice principles.
The court upheld that a third-party trust can be joined in property disputes if property transfers are executed lawfully and do not violate existing status quo orders regarding possession.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.