IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sandeep V. Marne, J.
Moghiben Bhachubai Gami and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (L) No. 16593 of 2023
Decided On : 25-01-2024
JUDGMENT:
1. This is a typical dispute amongst the slum dwellers/structure occupiers over choice of developer for implementation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioners, who claim to be eligible slum dwellers, are aggrieved by the appointment of Respondent No.7-Aquarock Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. for implementation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Accordingly they have challenged Minutes of the Meeting dated 17 January 2023 selecting Respondent No.7 as the developer for the Project. The Appeal preferred by the Petitioners before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee has been rejected by Order dated 5 June 2023, which is also subject matter of challenge in the present petition. Also challenged is the No-Objection Certificate (NOC) issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and final Annexure-II dated 26 September 2022 issued by the MCGM. Various other consequential and related prayers are also raised in the petition. Petitioners pray that a fresh General Body Meeting for appointment of developer and architect be conducted by giving opportunity to all the structure occupiers to vote in such meeting.
2. Two principal issues that arise in the petition are:
(i) entitlement of 13 structure occupiers who are tenants of MCGM to participate in the voting process as well as their eligibility to be included in Annexure -II and
(ii) manner of service of Notice and conduct of Meeting dated 17 January 2023 for selection of new developer.
3. To answer the issues, a brief narration of facts would be necessary. Land bearing CTS Nos. 2839 and 2839/1 to 13 situated at Village- Malvani, Taluka- Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District is owned by MCGM, in which there are 45 structures. The adjoining land bearing CTS No.2840 is owned by the Central Government, in which there are 11 structures located. Out of the 45 structures located on land belonging to Municipal Corporation, 16 structures are commercial and 29 are residential. Out of those 16 structures, there are 13 Shops located in structures belonging to MCGM and there is one Municipal Chowkey. MCGM has inducted Petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 7, 12, 14, 17, 23, 25 and 33 as municipal tenants in 12 out of those 13 shops. It is Petitioners’ case that the developer who was previously appointed (Manthan Builders) had submitted Annexure -II including names of Petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 7, 12, 14, 17, 23, 25 and 33 (municipal tenants) as occupiers of their respective structures.
4. By order dated 8 January 2020, Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) passed Order under Section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 (the Slum Act) terminating the appointment of Manthan Builders and directed conduct of Meeting by the Slum Society under the supervision of Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies (SRA) for appointing a new developer. It appears that in pursuance of the said directions, a meeting was held by the Slum Society on 23 February 2020 in which, Respondent No.7-Aquarock Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. was appointed as the developer. A report to that effect was submitted by the Assistant Registrar. Petitioners filed Application No. 210 of 2021 before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) seeking annulment of the General Body Resolution dated 23 February 2020 and sought holding of a fresh General Body Meeting. On 7 January 2022, AGRC passed interim order directing the Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, (SRA) to conduct a fresh General Body Meeting of all eligible slum dwellers/members.
5. On 23 August 2022, MCGM issued No Objection Certificate (NOC) for execution of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) on its Plot. In addition to several conditions of payment of premium and allotment of PAP tenements (in capacity as land owner), it also directed that in respect of its 13 shops, the developer shall allot 13 road facing commercial structures and shall also construct a municipal chowkey (in capacity as structure owner). On 26 September 2022, MCGM issued
AI
Only individuals holding a photopass qualify as protected occupiers under the Slum Act, thus excluding municipal tenants from voting in the developer selection process for the Slum Rehabilitation Sch....
The validity of General Body Resolutions (GBRs) for Slum Rehabilitation Scheme implementation is upheld, emphasizing that technical objections do not warrant interference unless clear illegality is e....
Public landowner has preferential redevelopment rights on reserved slum land; conditional NOC cancellation valid for developer's failure to provide compliant plans for public amenities, subordinating....
The CEO/SRA has the authority to terminate a Developer under Section 13(2) of the Slum Act for delays and non-performance in the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, emphasizing timely completion for public b....
[The court established that under Section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, the Competent Authority can terminate a developer's appointment based on ....
The court affirmed that the Petitioners, claiming tribal allotment rights, failed to prove ownership of the land, thus upholding the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme's implementation and eviction orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.