SANDEEP V. MARNE
Ramesh Anandrao Shirke (Since Decd. Thr. Lrs), Smt. Kusum Ramesh Shrike – Appellant
Versus
Kashinath Anna Jaigude – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Appellants call in question legality of the common Judgment and Order dated 13 April 2022 passed by Ad-hoc District Judge - 01 Satara in Regular Civil Appeal Nos. 384 of 2012 and 385 of 2012. The First Appellate Court has allowed both Appeals and has set aside the common Judgment and Decree dated 29 June 2012 passed by Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Wai in Regular Civil Suit Nos. 228 of 1994 and 273 of 1995. The First Appellate Court has declared that possession of the Appellants over the suit property is unlawful and it has directed the Appellants to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the suit property to the Respondents. Further direction is issued for enquiry into mense profit as per Order 20 Rule 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. Since cross suits were filed by the contesting parties, Ramesh Anandrao Shirke is referred to as Plaintiff (whose heirs are Appellants in these Appeals) and Kashinath Anna Jaigude is referred to as the Defendant (whose heirs are Respondents in these Appeals).
3. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the property bearing City Survey No. 2463 admeasuring 275.9 sq. mtrs. along with the constructed house thereon at Siddhan
Vinay Eknath Lad Vs. Chiu Mao Chen
A mortgagee, under Section 76 of the Transfer of Property Act, is entitled to seek recovery of possession from a gratuitous licensee, even without prior possession, and the extent of inquiry into the....
(1) Recovery of possession – Limitation – Suit based on title where plea of adverse possession had not been raised could not be barred by limitation on ground that it was filed after more than 12 yea....
The appellants' possession of the suit property is the settled possession and it has to be protected until they are evicted by due process of law. The respondent had lost the right to claim declarati....
In property disputes where neither party has a valid title, the person in prior possession is entitled to recover possession, and a suit for recovery of possession is maintainable even if the title i....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.