SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 298

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G. S. Kulkarni, Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, JJ.
Janaki Suresh - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India Through the Secretary, Woman and Child Welfar, Through office of Law & Justice and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No.15636 of 2023
Decided On : 07-02-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Kenny Thakkar a/w. Mr. Mehul Rathod, Mr. Laxminarayan Shukla
For the Respondent: Ms. S. D. Vyas, Addl. G. P. with. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for Mr. Y. S. Bhate a/w. Vaibhav R. Gargade i/b. Rahul Tiwari

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal principle established is the court's authority to appoint a legal guardian under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in cases of serious medical disabilities where existing laws do not provide adequate provisions.

Headnote:

Legal Guardian - Appointment of Legal Guardian - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Medical Certification - Doctrine of parens patriae - Appointment of legal guardian in cases of serious medical disabilities - Welfare of incapacitated persons

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to be declared as the legal guardian of her comatose husband and manage his affairs. The medical reports confirmed the husband's persistent vegetative state, and the petitioner faced financial constraints in managing his assets and family expenses.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's husband was in a comatose state for almost three years, and it was necessary to appoint the petitioner as his legal guardian to manage his properties and look after the family's welfare.

Issues: The main issue was whether the court should exercise its jurisdiction to appoint a legal guardian for a person in a persistent vegetative state.

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles of the doctrine of parens patriae and referred to a recent decision to justify the appointment of a legal guardian in cases of serious medical disabilities where the existing laws did not provide adequate provisions.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and appointed the petitioner as the legal guardian of her husband, directing all authorities to recognize her status and allow her to manage his assets and properties.

JUDGMENT :

G.S. Kulkarni, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. This Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed praying for the relief that the Petitioner-Mrs. Janaki Suresh be declared as the legal Guardian of Mr. Suresh Subramanian Iyer (for short “Mr. Iyer”), who is in comatose condition, and for other consequential reliefs in the nature of direction to the Respondents as also all the concerned Banks, Depository, Financial Institutions to allow the Petitioner to operate/ represent the affairs of Mr. Iyer.

3. The case of the Petitioner as set out in the Petition is that the Petitioner got married to Mr. Iyer on 9th September 1996. It is stated that they have three children, namely, Osho Suresh born on 26th August 1998, Ponni Suresh born on 3rd June, 2000 and Sachi Suresh born on 27th November 2007. The Petitioner has stated that the mother-in-law of the Petitioner, Mrs. Savithri Subramanian, is 78 years old and is currently residing in Thane. The Petitioner has annexed photocopies of her Aadhar Card and also the Aadhar Card of Mr. Iyer.

4. The Petitioner has contended that her husband, Mr. Iyer, has been employed with Abu Dhabi National Oil Company. She states that on or about 8th December 2021, Mr. Iyer was brought to AL Dhannah Hospital in Ruwais, Abu Dhabi, to the emergency department, in an unconscious state. She has described the medical condition of Mr. Iyer at the time when he was admitted in paragraph 5 of the Petition to contend that, since the time he was brought to the hospital, till the date of filing of this Petition, he was in a vegetative state. Mr. Iyer was shifted to long term acute care for supportive care, physiotherapy and rehabilitation. The Petitioner has stated that, since the date of Mr. Iyer’s hospitalization, i.e., from 8th December 2021, he has remained in a vegetative condition and there has been very little progress in his health condition. She has annexed to the Petition as Exhibit-C a Medical Certificate dated 02/08/2023 issued by the doctors confirming the fact that Mr. Iyer still continues to remain in persistent vegetative state and that his is unable to speak or sign or communicate in any manner.

5. The medical report of AL Dhannah Hospital dated 02/808/2023 needs to be noted which reads thus:-

“AL DHANNAH HOSPITAL

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

MEDICAL REPORT

Date:02-08-2023

 

Name

Mr. SURESH SUBRAMANIAN IYER

Medical Record Number

MA2200000042612

Nationality

Indian

Gender

Male

DOB

31-05-1966

Registered Contact Number

0504925169

Doctor Name

Dr. RaSha Sadek, Mohamed Shehata

    56-year-old male patient admitted on long term care as hypoglycemic encephalopathy, this patent arrested at home by hopoglycemia CPR done return pulse but kept in vegetative state.

Patient on PEG tube and Tracheostomy.

Generalized muscle wasting no movement only spontaneous eye opening.

Hemodynamically stable on room air.

For multidisciplinary Care nursing, physiotherapy, and occupational care.

Dr. Osman Mohammed Rafi Uz Zaman

Hospital Administrator”

6. She stated that, due to his health condition, it is not possible for Mr. Iyer to manage his assets, including Bank Accounts. The Petitioner has set out at Exhibit-D the details of two Bank Accounts and a Demat Account of Mr. Iyer. She has further stated in the Petition that Mr. Iyer was the sole earning member of the family and, in the absence of any income support from Mr. Iyer, the Petitioner has to take care of herself and her three children and run the household on her own. She had approached the Banks and also Depository with a request to allow her to sign and comply necessary formalities in place of Mr. Iyer. However, her request has been declined by the Banks and the Depository with a request to get herself appointed as the guardian or get an appropriate

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top