IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
Sonika Vishnudas Kadam – Appellant
Versus
Vishnudas Haribhau Kadam & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Application No.502 of 2022
Decided on : 05-02-2024
Transfer - Criminal Application - Section 407 (1)(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Summary of Acts and Sections: CrPC Section 406, CrPC Section 407, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (D.V. Act) Sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 10, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 - The court discussed the provisions of CrPC Section 406 and Section 407, as well as the relevant sections of the D.V. Act and Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and their applicability to the case. The court emphasized the factors to be considered for transfer of a case, including the ends of justice, convenience of parties and witnesses, and the fairness of the trial.
Fact of the Case:
The Applicant sought the transfer of a Domestic Violence case from Junnar to Thane, citing her forced relocation and the convenience of attending court in Thane. The Respondent contested, claiming the Applicant's husband resided in Pune.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Applicant's husband resided in Mumbai, not Pune, and that the convenience of attending court favored the transfer to Thane. The court emphasized the applicability of CrPC Section 407 (1)(c) and allowed the transfer.
Issues: The main issue was the transfer of the Domestic Violence case from Junnar to Thane, based on the convenience of the parties and the ends of justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the provisions of CrPC Section 407 (1)(c) and emphasized the factors to be considered for transfer, including the ends of justice, convenience of parties and witnesses, and the fairness of the trial.
Final Decision: The Criminal Application was allowed, and the case was transferred from Junnar to Thane.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, Mr. Adhikary, learned Counsel who has instructions to appear for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Ms. Kaushik, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State.
2. This is a Criminal Application filed under Section 407 (1)(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC”). The Applicant is seeking the following substantive prayer:-
3. It is necessary to set out certain factual aspects before considering the rival submissions :-
ii. As per the contention of the Applicant-Wife, the Applicant was ousted from her matrimonial house on 18th September 2016. The Applicant filed a Criminal M. A. No.17 of 2017 under Sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (“D.V. Act”) in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar. In the said D.V. Proceedings, address of the Applicant is mentioned as C/o. Devanand Narayan Chalak, R./at Dingare, Taluka Junnar, District-Pune. Said Devanand Chalak is uncle of the Applicant. It is specifically mentioned in the Application that as the Applicant was ousted from her matrimonial house by the Respondents on 18th September 2016 and thereafter she was threatened on several occasions by the Respondent No.1, the Applicant moved to her uncle’s residence at Dingare, Taluka-Junnar, District-Pune, and subsequently filed proceedings under the D.V. Act before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar. Perusal of the said D.V. proceedings clearly shows that in fact reference has also been made to the Complaint dated 13th December 2016 lodged in Ghatkopar Police Station, Mumbai by the Applicant.
iii. The present Respondent No.1 filed Marriage Petition No.A-3101 of 2016 under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the Family Court at Bandra seeking judicial separation. In the said proceedings, by Order dated 4th July 2019, learned Family Court at Bandra directed the Respondent No.1 to pay Rs.7,000/- per month towards interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and has further ordered payment of Rs.5,000/-per month towards rent. The Respondent No.1 on 1st April 2022 withdrew the said Marriage Petition No.A-3101 of 2016 without complying with the said order and without making any payment. It is contended by the Applicant that the said Marriage Petition filed before Family Court at Bandra was withdrawn behind the back of the Applicant.
4. In the above facts and circumstances, the present Criminal Application is preferred inter alia stating that the Applicant and her mother are residing at Diva (E), Thane 400612. It is stated that the said Criminal M.A. No.17 of 2017 was filed at Junnar as at that time owing to a threat to her life in Mumbai, she was forced to reside at Junnar and as the Applicant was in desperate need of interim orders under the provisions of the D.V. Act she has filed the case at Junnar, Pune. It is stated in the Application that Junnar is about 155 k.m. away from Diva and that the said case be transferred to the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thane. It is also stated that the Respondent No.3 is residing at Ghatkopar, Mumbai.
5. Mr. Nikhil Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant pointed out the above facts and submitted that in the facts and circumstances of this case and in the interest of justice, the said D.V. proceedings be transferred from the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Junnar
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of CrPC Section 407 (1)(c) for the transfer of a case, emphasizing the ends of justice and the convenience of the parties and wi....
Transfer of criminal case – In a criminal case, place of inquiry and trial has to be by Court within whose local jurisdiction, crime was allegedly committed as provided by Section 177 of Cr.P.C.
Transfer of criminal cases requires exceptional circumstances; mere apprehension of injustice is insufficient.
The convenience and inconvenience of the parties must be considered in transfer petitions, and the current residence and filing of cases in a particular jurisdiction can influence the decision to tra....
The court emphasized that in domestic violence cases, transfer applications must balance the convenience of both parties, preferentially considering the welfare of the woman, but acknowledging men's ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a reasonable apprehension for transfer under Section 407 of the CrPC, as emphasized by relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.