IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
Rabindra Nath Acherjee@Acharya & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Biplab Mukherjee – Respondent
CRR 1679 of 2022
Decided On : 21-03-2024
Transfer of Criminal Case - Transfer of Criminal Case - [Indian Penal Code, Sections 448/323/379/427/504/34, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Sections 17/18/19/20/21/22/23, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1), Code of Civil Procedure, Section 24] - The court allowed the transfer of the criminal case based on the age of the petitioners, the presence of minor children, and the fact that other proceedings were pending before the Durgapur Court. The decision was influenced by the Supreme Court guidelines on transfer of cases, emphasizing the need for a credible case for transfer and the convenience of all parties involved in the proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought transfer of a criminal case due to difficulty in attending the court, especially because of their age and the presence of minor children. The opposite party did not appear despite due service.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the transfer of the criminal case, considering the age of the petitioners, the presence of minor children, and the fact that other proceedings were pending before the Durgapur Court. The decision was influenced by the Supreme Court guidelines on transfer of cases.
Issues: Difficulty in attending court due to age and presence of minor children, non-appearance of the opposite party, and the need for transfer based on the Supreme Court guidelines.
Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the transfer of the criminal case based on the age of the petitioners, the presence of minor children, and the fact that other proceedings were pending before the Durgapur Court. The decision was influenced by the Supreme Court guidelines on transfer of cases, emphasizing the need for a credible case for transfer and the convenience of all parties involved in the proceedings.
Final Decision: The court allowed the transfer of the criminal case and directed it to be transferred to the file of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman, through the respective learned District Judges for expeditious disposal.
JUDGMENT :
Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.
1. The present revision is an application for transfer of the proceeding arising out of the complaint in connection with the Case no. C. Case No 209/2018 (T.R NO. 62/2018) dated 28.11.2018 under Sections 448/323/379/427/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending before the Learned Judicial Magistrate. 1st Class, 3rd Court, Katwa, at Purba Bardhaman to the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman or to any other appropriate Court having jurisdiction, in terms of Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
2. The petitioners submit that the petitioners no. 1, 2 and 3 are aged persons and petitioner no. 4 is the younger daughter of petitioner no. 1 and 2.
3. That, prior to the alleged complaint the wife (elder daughter of the petitioner no 1 & 2) of the complainant/opposite party herein had also filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for reliefs under Sections 17/18/19/20/21/22/23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the same was registered as being Misc. Case No. 406/2015, and the said case was contested by the complainant/opposite party herein. The opposite party also had preferred an Appeal being criminal Appeal No. 01/2017(06/17) challenging the order of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 4th Court, at Durgapur and the Judge Special cum Additional District and Sessions Judge, Durgapur had also affirmed the order passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate in Misc. Case No. 406/2015.
4. That, prior to this alleged complaint, the wife (elder daughter of the petitioner no 1 & 2) of the complainant/opposite party herein had also filed a criminal case against the complainant and his family members under Sections 498A/354/354B/307/406/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and the same was registered as Durgapur Police Staten Case no. 364/2017 dated 11.06.2017 and the same is pending before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman and the complainant/opposite party herein is attending the said case at Durgapur.
5. That, the complainant/opposite party herein, had filed another application under Section 13(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 being Matrimonial case no. 49 of 2019 against his wife and the same had been filed before the Learned Additional District, judge, at Katwa, Purba Bardhaman.
6. Thereafter, the wife (daughter of the petitioners no. 1 and 2 ) filed an application before this Hon’ble Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure for transfer of the aforesaid Matrimonial Suit no. 49 of 2019, from Learned Additional District Judge at Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman and same was allowed by this Hon’ble Court.
7. The petitioners submit that the petitioners no. 1, 2 and 3 are aged persons and petitioner no. 4 is a newly married woman residing in her matrimonial house and are residents of Durgapur, Paschim Bardhaman, West Bengal, and Katwa Court is situated at a road distance of about 135 Kilometers via National Highway and State Highway from Benachity, Durgapur and takes more than four hours to reach Katwa Court.
8. That the petitioners are facing great difficulty in attending Katwa Court, since the petitioners are resident of Benachity, Durgapur, West Bengal, and on the dates fixed before the Katwa Court, the petitioners are forced and/or bound to travel to Katwa court along with their elder daughter (wife of the complainant herein) and minor grandson aged about 8 (eight) years as the petitioners herein cannot travel alone due to their old age issues and thus it is very difficult for the petitioners either to travel all the way to Katwa Court with their minor grandson and daughter or to keep their minor grandson alone at their residence and travel to Katwa. It is further stated that the petitioner no. 4 has a newborn baby and she is also having great difficulty to travel.
9. Hence the prayer for transfer.
10. In spite of due service there is no representation
Captain Amrinder Singh Vs. Prakash Singh Badal & Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a reasonable apprehension for transfer under Section 407 of the CrPC, as emphasized by relevant case law.
The court may allow the transfer of a case under Section 12 of the PWDV Act when it deems it necessary in the interest of justice, considering the circumstances of the parties involved.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of CrPC Section 407 (1)(c) for the transfer of a case, emphasizing the ends of justice and the convenience of the parties and wi....
Transfer of criminal cases under Section 407 Cr.P.C. requires substantial grounds beyond mere convenience or apprehension; the applicant must demonstrate a reasonable basis for fearing an unfair tria....
Transfer of trial under Section 407 of Cr.P.C. requires substantiation of reasonable apprehension of unfair trial, considering the convenience of all parties involved.
Point of Law : An order of transfer is not to be passed as a matter of routine or merely because an interested party has expressed some apprehension about proper conduct of the trial. The power has t....
Transfer of trial should only be considered when fair justice is in peril and when there is a well-substantiated apprehension that justice will not be dispensed impartially, objectively, and without ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.