Pradeep Kumar Das vs Deeptimayee Das @ Puthal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SAVITRI RATHO
Pradeep Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
Deeptimayee Das @ Puthal – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Samir Kumar Mishra
For the Respondent: Smruti Ranjan Mohapatra

Table of Content
1. transfer application under cr.p.c. (Para 1)
2. comparative inconvenience of parties (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. employment status and background information (Para 5 , 6)
4. previous transfer orders (Para 7)
5. court observations on facts and conveniences (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
6. judicial principles on dv act transfer (Para 11 , 12)
7. final orders on case transfer (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

1. This transfer application under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short “the Cr.P.C”) has been filed by the petitioner - husband-Pradeep Kumar Das for transfer of D.V. Misc. Case No.130 of 2020 filed by the opposite party (in short “opp.party”) - wife Deeptimayee Das @ Puthal, under Section 12 (2) read with Section 17 (1), Section 18 , Section 19 (1), Section 20 & Section 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (in short “the DV Act”) in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Balasore, to the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is presently posted in Rayagada District working as Deputy Manager of Technical Department in Utkal Alumina International Ltd, a unit of Aditya Birla Gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACKSAVITRI RATHOPradeep Kumar Das – AppellantVersusDeeptimayee Das @ Puthal – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SAVITRI RATHO
Pradeep Kumar Das – Appellant
Versus
Deeptimayee Das @ Puthal – Respondent