Rajuram Sawaji Purohit vs Shandar Interior Private Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Bom) 419

R. I. CHAGLA
Rajuram Sawaji Purohit – Appellant
Versus
Shandar Interior Private Ltd. – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, Counsel a/w Mr. Anuj Desai, Counsel a/w Mr. Umesh Tawari i/b S. Ashwinkumar & Co. LLP, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Rakesh Agrawal, Counsel a/w Ms. Sukhada Dalvi i/b Mr. Parmeshwar Bhise, Advocate

Table of Content
1. setting aside the award. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding limitation period. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. claim barred by law of limitation. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. conditions for the applicability of section 14. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. good faith in prosecuting winding-up petition. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
6. exclusion of time due to prior proceedings. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
7. jurisdictional defect and its implications. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
8. differences between winding-up and recovery suits. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
9. burden of proof regarding limitation. (Para 43 , 44 , 45)
10. supreme court’s perspective on section 14. (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
11. binding precedents and their application. (Para 49 , 50 , 51)
12. disputed fact and mixed questions. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
13. scope of interference under section 34. (Para 56 , 57 , 58)
14. petitioner’s assertions in pleadings. (Para 59 , 60 , 61)
15. interpretation of section 14. (Para 62 , 63 , 64)
16. conditions for section 14 applicability. (Para 65 , 66 , 67)
17. difference in prior and subsequent proceedings. (Para 68 , 69 , 70)
18. reading judgments in con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Bom) 419

R. I. CHAGLARajuram Sawaji Purohit – AppellantVersusShandar Interior Private Ltd. – Respondent

Cases Referred (11)

R. I. CHAGLA
Rajuram Sawaji Purohit – Appellant
Versus
Shandar Interior Private Ltd. – Respondent