SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1955

R. M. JOSHI
Shivaji – Appellant
Versus
Satish – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.A. Khande, Advocate, Sachin Panale, Advocate, M.D. Shinde, Advocate, Shrikant Kulkarni, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This appeal is filed under Sec. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') by original plaintiff in R.C.S. No. 425/2012 and being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Latur in R.C.A. No. 87/2017 has preferred this Appeal. Parties are referred to by their nomenclature in the original proceedings.

2. In short the case of the plaintiff and defendant, which has led to this appeal, can be summarized as follows: Plaintiff filed suit for declaration that he is the owner and in possession of land admeasuring 1H 68R land towards west side in Block no. 512 admeasuring

3. H 36R and has sought injunction restraining the defendant from disturbing his peaceful possession over the suit land. Plaintiff and Defendant no. 2 are brothers. It is claimed by Plaintiff that there was a partition between brothers in respect of land block no. 512 and land admeasuring 1H 68R land towards western side of the said block came to his share. He further stated that defendant no. 2 executed agreement to sell with plaintiff on 19/7/2003 in respect of 1H 68R land towards east side of the said land. Defendant no. 2 thereafter executed nominal sale deed in favour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top