S.B.SINHA, V.S.SIRPURKAR
Tanusree Basu – Appellant
Versus
Ishani Prasad Basu – Respondent
judgment
S.B. Sinha, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. The parties hereto are co-sharers. A suit was filed for partition. Admittedly they had entered into a development agreement. The properties which were in possession of the owners were described in Schedule A of the plaint; whereas the properties which were subject matter of the development agreement were described in Scheduled B thereof in the plaint filed by the appellant in the Court of 8th Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Alipore registered Title Suit No. 9 of 2004.
In terms of the development agreement, three flats and parking spaces for three cars had been allotted to the parties. An application for grant of injunction in respect of Schedule A property restraining the respondents from handing over the owners the allotted flats and from selling out any flats in the premises in question, was filed in the suit on or about 14.03.2004 wherein it was inter alia averred :
“That at present the plaintiffs and the defendant no. 1 to 6 are occupying 3 flats and 3 garages at premises no. 46A, Purna Chandra Mitra Lake, Kolkata 700033, which are also undivided property.”
It was furthermore averred :
“–That at present the plaintiffs have 93/240, undivided
Spandan Diagnostic and Research Centre Private Limited and Ors. v. Shri Ritendra Nath Ghosh and Ors.
REFERRED TO : Manohar Lal Chopra v. Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal
Jahuri Sah and others v. Dwarika Prasad Jhunjhunwala and others
Kishore Kumar Khaitan and Anr. v. Praveen Kumar Singh
India Household and Healthcare Ltd. v. LG Household and Healthcare Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.