SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1947

SUNIL B. SHUKRE, V. V. JOSHI
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.A. Naik, Advocate, D.L. Dharmadhikari, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

SUNIL B.SHUKRE, J. - Heard.

2. Leave to file on record a Pursis marked as document-A along with three documents marked as documents-A1, A2 and A3 is granted and copies of Pursis and documents be furnished to learned AGP forthwith.

3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties.

4. The petitioner is an Associate Professor working with Superspeciality Hospital, Government Medical College, Nagpur. The petitioner, in response to the advertisement No.008/2021, inviting applications from the eligible Associate Professors in Cardiology for their selection and appointment as Professor in Cardiology, made an application for that post. Along with his application, the petitioner had enclosed all the necessary documents including copies of paper publications and letters showing dates of acceptance of those research papers which were sent by the petitioner for their publication in the prescribed journal. During scrutiny of the application, the petitioner, however, was found to be ineligible to take part in the selection and appointment process. The decision of the MPSC holding the petitioner "ineligible" for the post of Professor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top