Back
RAJANI DUBEY
Ravi Darshan Chouksey S/o Teerath Prasad Choudsey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ of mandamus and certiorari and for other suitable direction to the respondents, as the name of the petitioner has been kept in the non eligible candidates for the post of Assistant Professor (Geography).
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had done Masters of Philosophy (M. PHIL) in Geography subject in the year 2008 from Doctor Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, Sagar. The respondent No.2 published an advertisement vide No.01/2009/ Examination/Dated 15/05/2009 for selection and recruitment of the 878 posts of the Assistant Professors under the Higher Education Department, State of Chhattisgarh. The written examination for the aforesaid selection of the Assistant Professors was held on 29/11/2009 and thereafter the result of the same was declared. The petitioner duly appeared in the said written examination by fulfilling all the requisite qualification for the post of Assistant Professor (Geography) but he was declar
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for candidates to comply with the submission of required documents as per the notice, and the court's reluctance to intervene in....
Eligibility for appointment must be assessed based on qualifications held by the application deadline, and misrepresentation disqualifies candidates from consideration.
Candidate eligibility must be satisfied by the application cutoff date; subsequent qualifications cannot be considered in selection processes.
Under Article 226 of the Constitution is based on the existence of a right in favour of the person invoking the jurisdiction, and the exception to the general rule is only in cases where the writ app....
Recruitment processes demand strict documentary compliance for eligibility verification like API scores; timely objections to tentative ineligibility lists mandatory; courts refrain from interfering ....
The court emphasized that it cannot rewrite the terms of recruitment and cannot issue directions contrary to the eligibility requirements under the applicable terms.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
